Yonemura Y, Tsukiyama G, Miyata R, Sako S, Endou Y, Hirano M, Mizumoto A, Matsuda T, Takao N, Ichinose M, Miura M, Hagiwara A, Li Y.

NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment.

Abstract

A total of 521 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) were treated by peritonectomy and perioperative chemotherapy. Each of the 95, 58, 316, 31, 10 and 11 patients were from gastric, colorectal, appendiceal, ovarian, small bowel cancer and mesothelioma, respectively. The distribution and volume of PC are recorded by the Sugarbaker peritoneal carcinomatosis index( PCI). Peritonectomy was performed with a radical resection of the primary tumor and all gross PC with involved organs, peritoneum, or tissue that was deemed technically feasible and safe for the patient. The postoperative major complication of grade 3 was found in 14%, and total 30 – day mortality was 2.7%. The survival of gastric cancer patients with a PCI score ≤ 6 was significantly better than those with a PCI score ≥ 7. In appendiceal neoplasm, patients with PCI score less than 28 showed significantly better survival than those with PCI score greater than 29. The survival of colorectal cancer patients with a PCI score ≥ 11 was significantly poorer than those with a PCI score ≤ 10. Among the various prognostic factors in appendiceal neoplasm and gastric cancer patients, CC – 0 complete cytoreduction was the most important independent prognostic factor. Peritonectomy is done to remove macroscopic disease and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy to eradicate microscopic residual disease aiming to remove disease completely with a single procedure. Peritonectomy combined with perioperative chemotherapy may achieve long – term survival in a selected group of patients with PC. The higher mortality rate underlines this necessarily strict selection that should be reserved to experienced institutions.

Passot G, Cotte E, Brigand C, Beaujard AC, Isaac S, Gilly FN, Glehen O.

Service de chirurgie générale digestive et endocrinienne, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud (CHLS) – Lyon.

Abstract

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare and lethal disease. Locoregional treatments combining cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) seem to improve prognosis.

Methods: Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC was performed in 22 patients at the Centre Hospitalier-Lyon Sud between 1989 and 2006. A retrospective analysis of survival was carried out to assess clinical and histological prognostic factors.

Results: Nineteen patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma were included (16 epithelial, 3 biphasic and 3 multicystic forms). Sixteen patients presented stage 3 or 4 peritoneal carcinomatosis according to the Gilly classification. Optimal cytoreductive surgery was performed for 11 patients (complete macroscopic resection or residual tumor nodules less than 2.5mm). No post-operative deaths occurred but 9 patients (47%) presented grade III or IV post-operative complications. The overall median survival was 36.9 months; completeness of cytoreduction was the only significant prognostic factor.

Conclusion: Cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC may improve the length of survival for patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma; such patients should be treated in specialized centers.

Keywords: Peritoneal Mesothelioma , Treatment , Cytoreductive surgery , Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Baratti D, Kusamura S, Cabras AD, Dileo P, Laterza B, Deraco M.

Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

Improved survival has been reported for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) treated by cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The issue of treatment failure has never been extensively addressed. The present study assessed the failure pattern, management, and outcome of progressive DMPM following comprehensive treatment. Clinical data on 70 patients with DMPM undergoing cytoreduction and HIPEC were prospectively collected; after a median follow-up of 43 months, disease progression occurred in 38 patients. Progressive disease distribution in 13 abdominopelvic regions was analyzed. In 28 patients undergoing adequate cytoreduction (residual tumor < or =2.5 mm), clinicopathological factors correlating to disease progression in each region were investigated. Median time to progression was 9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-35.9]. Median survival from progression was 8 months (95% CI 4-16.2). The failure pattern was categorized as peritoneal progression (n = 31), liver metastases (n = 1), abdominal lymph-node involvement (n = 2), pleural seeding (n = 4). Small bowel was the single site most commonly involved (n = 27). Residual tumor < or =2.5 mm (versus no visible) was the only independent risk factor for disease progression in epigastric region (P = 0.047), upper ileum (P = 0.029), upper jejunum (P = 0.034), and lower jejunum (P = 0.002). Progressive disease was treated with second HIPEC in 3 patients, debulking in 4, systemic chemotherapy in 16, and supportive care in 15. At multivariate analysis, time to progression <9 months (P = 0.009), poor performance status (P = 0.005), and supportive care (P = 0.003) correlated to reduced survival from progression. We conclude that minimal residual disease, compared with macroscopically complete cytoreduction, correlated to failure in critical anatomical areas, suggesting the need for maximal cytoreductive surgical efforts. In selected patients, aggressive management of progressive disease seems worthwhile.

Miao N, Pingpank JF, Alexander HR, Royal R, Steinberg SM, Quezado MM, Beresnev T, Quezado ZM.

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Services, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, MSC-1512, Building 10, Room 2C624, Bethesda, MD 20892-1512, USA.

Abstract

Cytoreductive surgery and continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) involve the conduct of a complex surgical procedure and delivery of high-dose hyperthermic chemotherapy to the peritoneum. This therapeutic modality has been shown to benefit patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis resulting from gastrointestinal and ovarian tumors and mesothelioma. However, it is unknown whether the primary disease (mesothelioma versus peritoneal carcinomatosis) affects hemodynamic and metabolic perturbations during the course of CHPP with cisplatin. We examined the perioperative course of patients undergoing CHPP with cisplatin and evaluated the effect of primary diagnosis (mesothelioma versus peritoneal carcinomatosis) on hemodynamic and metabolic parameters in response to peritoneal perfusion. Sixty-nine mesothelioma and 100 peritoneal carcinomatosis patients underwent 169 consecutive cytoreduction and CHPP procedures with general anesthesia. During CHPP, patients from both groups developed significant increases in central venous pressure, and heart rate, decreases in mean arterial pressure (all P < 0.0001), metabolic acidosis with significant decreases in pH and bicarbonate (P < 0.0001), deterioration of gas exchange with significant increases in PaCO₂ and oxygen alveolar–arterial gradient (P < 0.0001), and significant increases in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) and decreases in hematocrit and platelet counts (all P < 0.0001). However, patients with mesothelioma had lesser increases in temperature (P < 0.01) and heart rate (P < 0.0001) and lesser decreases in hematocrit (P = 0.0013) during CHPP and greater decreases in sodium bicarbonate (P = 0.0082) after completion of CHPP compared with patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. We conclude that the transient hemodynamic and metabolic perturbations associated with cytoreductive surgery and CHPP with cisplatin can vary according to the primary diagnosis (mesothelioma versus peritoneal carcinomatosis) warranting this therapy.

Yang XJ, Li Y, al-shammaa Hassan AH, Yang GL, Liu SY, Lu YL, Zhang JW, Yonemura Y.

Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital, Cancer Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuchang District, China.

Abstract

We evaluated the perioperative safety profile and efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in 21 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers. Twenty-one patients with PC (12 gastric cancer, 5 colorectal cancer, 2 ovarian cancer, 1 pseudomyxoma peritonei, 1 malignant mesothelioma) were treated with CRS + HIPEC with hydroxycamptothecin 20 mg and mitomycin C 30 mg in 12,000 mL of normal saline at 43 ± .5°C for 60 to 90 minutes. Vital signs were recorded for 5 days after surgery. We analyzed the following: local and systemic infections; gastrointestinal function recovery; hematological, hepatic, and renal parameters; wound healing time; adverse events; survival; and quality of life. The PC index was 2 to 33 (median, 11), the duration of operation 4 to 10 h (median, 8 h), and the highest temperature during 5 postoperative days 38.1°C. Two patients developed generalized edema and were successfully treated. Five patients developed hypoproteinemia on day 1 after surgery. All routine blood tests checked at 1 week after surgery were normal. Time of gastric tube removal was 2 to 7 days. Liquid food intake time was 3 to 8 days. Time of removal of stitches was 8 to 18 days. No local or systemic infections, wound disruption, or other clinically important adverse events occurred. The follow-up was 8 to 43 months (median, 22.5 months). Eleven patients died, three survived with tumor, and seven survived free of tumor. CRS + HIPEC was well tolerated in our selected patients with PC, some of whom had improved survival.

Chua TC, Yan TD, Morris DL.

Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

Aims: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rapidly progressing malignancy with a median survival of 6-12 months. Palliative surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are futile and have not shown to improve survival. This paper reports the outcomes of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of this disease.

Patients and Methods: An observational study of 20 patients with peritoneal mesothelioma treated with CRS and HIPEC at the St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison using the Log Rank test.

Results: There were six females. The mean age was 55.7 (9.0) years. The median survival was 29.5 (0.46-87.2) months with 1- and 3-year survival of 78.2% and 46.3%, respectively. Survival was found to be influenced by completeness of cytoreduction (P = 0.02) and histological subtype (P = 0.01). Patients with epitheloid peritoneal mesothelioma who had a CC0 had a median survival of 87.2 months.

Conclusion: CRS and HIPEC is a treatment option for peritoneal mesothelioma. Patients with epithelioid tumor who undergo complete cytoreduction may potentially benefit from this procedure.

Keywords: cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, mesothelioma, peritoneal neoplasms, peritonectomy

Foster JM, Gatalica Z, Lilleberg S, Haynatzki G, Loggie BW.

Division of Surgical Oncology, Creighton University Medical Center, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68131, USA. jasonfoster@creighton.edu

Abstract

Malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas (MPM) are rare tumors representing 20% of all malignant mesothelioma cases. The median survival for these tumors is less than a year, and like other peritoneal surface malignancies, this is due primarily to intra-abdominal recurrence and progression. Currently there is a paucity of information about the biology of these tumors and molecular perturbations that are involved in tumor formation. Elucidation of mutations and biological pathways active in these tumors may identify valuable prognostic markers, as well as facilitate the development of novel therapies. In this study, we investigate the predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in achieving optimal resectability. Twenty-nine patients with MPM were evaluated at a single tertiary care center and their tumors were probed for point mutations in the catalytic TK domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (mut+). All specimens were examined for somatic mutations by polymerase chain reaction amplification, and all variants were confirmed by multiple independent amplifications. Twenty-five patients were treated with cytoreductive surgery with or without intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy and complete clinical data including age, sex, cytoreductive score, mutation, and survival were available for comparison of the mut+ and mut- groups. The median age was 56 years, 71% of the patients were male, and the median follow-up time was 14.5 months. Mutations were found in 31% (9 of 29) of the tumors. Seven of these mutations were novel, and one was the L858R mutation described in non-small-cell lung cancer. Of the 25 patients managed surgically, 7 had mut+ and 18 wild type (mut-) disease. Optimal resectability was achieved in 7 (100%) of 7 of mut+ group and 9 (50%) of 18 mut- (p = .026). All mut+ patients are alive with a mean follow-up time of 24 months, whereas 5 (28%) of 18 of the mut- group are dead of disease with a mean follow-up time of 7 months (p = .27). In an analysis of covariance model, only optimal resectability (p = .04) was found to be predictive of survival. EGFR-TK seems to be a common site for mutation in MPM, with mutations being identified in 31% of patients. The EGFR mutations identified included the L858R activating mutation, as well as eight novel EGFR-TK catalytic domain point mutations. These mutations were predictive of optimal resectability, which was the only variable found to be predictive of survival. With longer follow-up, mut+ may not only be predictive of survival but may represent a subset of patients whose disease may be responsive to TK-inhibitor therapy. Experiments confirming the activating properties of the novel mutations are warranted.

Yano H, Moran BJ, Cecil TD, Murphy EM.

Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Centre, Colorectal Research Unit, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, Hampshire, UK.

Abstract

Aims: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare disease and traditionally has been associated with a gloomy prognosis. The present study aimed to report the outcomes following surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy in selected patients with peritoneal mesothelioma.

Methods: Clinicopathological features, operative procedures, early outcomes and survival were analysed for 17 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal mesothelioma between 1998 and 2007. Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal mesothelioma between 1998 and 2007 were analysed for clinicopathological features, operative procedures, early outcomes and survival.

Results: Seventeen patients underwent 18 laparotomies. Most presented with abdominal distension (71%) and abdominal pain or discomfort (53%). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 8 patients, major debulking in 8, and 1 patient had an exploratory laparotomy only due to extensive disease. One patient died on day 30 postoperatively due to a chest infection and pulmonary embolism. The median survival for 8 patients who underwent complete cytoreduction was 3.7 years (range, 0.7–6.9), whereas that for 8 patients with palliative debulking was 1.0 years year (range, 0.3–5.7). Among the 12 patients who had significant ascites as a presenting symptom, 10 reported good palliation of ascites.

Conclusions: Cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy appears to be the optimal treatment for selected patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. Increased familiarity with this condition’s presentation and natural history, and knowledge of available treatment options, will hopefully facilitate treatment of these patients and expedite speedy referral to appropriate treatment centres.

Keywords: Peritoneal mesothelioma; Cytoreductive surgery; Intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Hesdorffer ME, Chabot J, DeRosa C, Taub R.

Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. mhesdorer@curemeso.org

Abstract

Opinion statement: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive neoplasm that rapidly spreads within the confines of the abdominal cavity to involve most accessible peritoneal and omental surfaces. Current treatment options are unsatisfactory, and new approaches are needed. Recent publications have reported improved survival with an intensive loco-regional treatment strategy including cytoreductive surgery (CRS) along with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). We have noted at our institution prolonged survival in selected patients after intensive multimodality treatment. Our most recently reported trial included initial laparatomy with omentectomy, resection of peritoneal implants, and placement of bilateral peritoneal Portacath; repeated courses of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cisplatin, and interferon gamma; second-look laparotomy; and intraoperative hyperthermic perfusion with mitomycin and cisplatin, followed by whole abdominal radiation. To date there have been no universally accepted treatments for MPM. Unless referred to a specialty center, patients are routinely treated with pemetrexed and cisplatin which has been shown to increase survival in pleural mesothelioma.

Deraco M, Bartlett D, Kusamura S, Baratti D.

Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy. marcello.deraco@istitutotumori.mi.it

Abstract

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) has been traditionally regarded as a rapidly lethal disease. Recently, several independent prospective trials have reported improved survival with an intensive loco-regional treatment strategy including cytoreductive surgery (CRS) along with peri-operative intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (PIC). However, most of the surgical data comes from mono-institutional phase I or II studies and there is a broad range of variability regarding inclusion criteria, cytoreductive surgical procedures, drugs, temperatures and methods of delivering the heated chemotherapy (open vs. closed abdomen). This manuscript critically analyze and discuss the results of a group of health care providers trying to achieve a consensus statement in the management of this group of patients. The main conflicting points regarding preoperative evaluation, patient eligibility, combined treatment methodology, postoperative follow-up and future investigational perspectives were summarized as a list of multiple-choice questions. A questionnaire was placed on the website of the “5^{th International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancies” and the group members voted via internet. The results were presented for further debate during a dedicated session of the Workshop. The general treatment guidelines and future investigational perspectives were defined.}

Keywords: consensus, peritoneal mesothelioma, cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC