Kimura T, Koyama K, Kudoh S, Kawabe J, Yoshimura N, Mitsuoka S, Shiomi S, Hirata K.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka. kimutats@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp

Abstract

We report a 56-year-old man who underwent monitoring of the response to chemotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). ⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-_D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) were performed prior to chemotherapy and after the first and second courses of chemotherapy. The tumor lesion exhibited shrinkage on CT and a decrease in the standardized uptake value (SUV) max after the first course of chemotherapy, but exhibited size enlargement and an increase in SUV max after the second course of chemotherapy. These findings suggest that results of quantification of metabolic response by FDG-PET are related to the objective response as determined by CT in patients with MPM.

Keywords: FDG-PET, mesothelioma, SUV, response

Schneider J, Hoffmann H, Dienemann H, Herth FJ, Meister M, Muley T.

Institute and Policlinic for Occupational and Social Medicine, Justus-Liebig Universität, Giessen, Germany.

Abstract

Introduction and Methods: We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of soluble mesothelin-related proteins (SMRP) in sera from patients with newly diagnosed malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (n = 100), MPM patients at tumor relapse (n = 29), primary lung cancer (n = 139), and benign asbestosis (n = 75) using Mesomark-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Fujirebio Diagnostics, Malvern, PA).

Results: SMRP concentrations were significantly higher in MPM compared with benign asbestosis (p < 0.001) or lung cancer (p < 0.001). The median values were 1.4 nM, 0.9 nM, and 0.8 nM, respectively. The best statistical cutoff was found to be 1.35 nM resulting in a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 82.7%. Receiver operating characteristics curves gave an area under curve of 0.72 for the discrimination between MPM and non-MPM patients (p < 0.001). No significant differences in SMRP levels were found among histologies and stages of MPM. The highest median SMRP levels (4.2 nM) were measured in 29 MPM patients with relapse/progression (75.8% > 1.35 nM). Univariately, SMRP discriminated significantly (p < 0.003) between favorable (n = 71, median survival: 17.1 month; 1-year survival: 63.1%) and worse prognosis (n = 20, median survival: 8.4 months, 1-year survival: 32%) at 3.5 nM. In multivariate analysis, histology, therapy, and SMRP were shown to be independent prognostic
factors in all MPM patients (hazard ratio for SMRP: 1.96; p = 0.025). Nevertheless, subtype-driven reanalysis showed only a trend in epithelial MPM.

Conclusion: In conclusion, SMRP add limited information to the diagnosis of MPM. Nevertheless, SMRP might be a useful measure in treatment and monitoring of MPM. The prognostic impact of SMRP in MPM is not conclusive and needs further evaluation.

Tournoy KG, Burgers SA, Annema JT, Vermassen F, Praet M, Smits M, Klomp HM, van Meerbeeck JP, Baas P.

Department of Respiratory Medicine and Lung Oncology Network, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, Belgium. kurt.tournoy@UGent.be

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical resection as part of a multimodality approach in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has a high morbidity and mortality. Because mediastinal lymph node (MLN) metastases are a negative prognostic factor, preoperative staging is of paramount importance. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound with real-time guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) enables accurate MLN staging in lung cancer.

Experimental Design: The feasibility and yield of EUS-FNA in MLN staging were prospectively analyzed in patients with presumed early-stage MPM considered for multimodality therapy. MLN reference pathology was defined by either pathologic staging or the formal demonstration of malignant cells by either EUS-FNA or mediastinoscopy.

Results: Thirty-two consecutive patients (81% males; median age, 61 years) with proven MPM underwent EUS-FNA. In 11 (34%) patients, a negative EUS-FNA or mediastinoscopy was not confirmed by surgical MLN dissection because of clinical deterioration or disease progression. In 21 (66%) patients, a formal pathology of the MLN was obtained and staging with EUS-FNA was positive in 4 (19%). Mediastinoscopy did not result in a greater yield of MLN metastasis as compared with EUS-FNA. Thoracotomy with complete lymph node dissection was done in 17 (81%). The overall prevalence of MLN metastasis was 24%, and the sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 80% (95% confidence interval, 28-99%) with a specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 79-100%). One patient had esophageal perforation related to EUS-FNA.

Conclusions: EUS-FNA is feasible and sensitive for MLN staging in patients with MPM who are candidate for multimodality treatment. These data warrant further evaluation.

Flores RM, Routledge T, Seshan VE, Dycoco J, Zakowski M, Hirth Y, Rusch VW.

Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA. floresr@mskcc.org

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of pleural fluid glucose, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin, total protein, and total leukocyte levels in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. We retrospectively analyzed 71 consecutive patients (33 men and 38 women) who were referred to the department of chest diseases in a university hospital. Pleural fluid glucose levels, the ratio of pleural fluid to serum LDH>1.0, and total leukocyte count were significant predictors for the survival in univariate analysis. However, none of these variables emerged as statistically significant from the multivariate Cox model. In conclusion, our results showed that there is an inverse correlation between the intensity of inflammation and survival.

Keywords: pleural neoplasms, prognosis, survival analysis, malignant pleural effusion

Flores RM, Routledge T, Seshan VE, Dycoco J, Zakowski M, Hirth Y, Rusch VW.

Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA. floresr@mskcc.org

Abstract

Objectives: The propensity of malignant pleural mesothelioma to metastasize to N1 or N2 nodes and their corresponding prognostic value is unclear. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system groups N1 and N2 disease together as stage III. The goal of this study was to define the prognostic value of specific nodal stations.

Methods: Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who underwent resection were identified from an institutional database. Nodal stations were defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer lung cancer node map classification. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results: From 1990 to 2006, 348 patients were identified: 279 men and 69 women with a median age of 67 years (range 26–85 years). Extrapleural pneumonectomy was performed in 223 cases, and pleurectomy/decortication was performed in 125 cases. Survival differences (P < .01) were observed between 2 groups: N0 or N1(+) (median survival = 19 months) and N2(+), N2/N1(+) and internal thoracic(+) (median survival = 10 months). Survival was influenced by the number of involved N2 stations (0, 1, 2, or more: P < .001). Multivariate analysis grouping all N2 and internal thoracic(+) versus N1(+) and N0 demonstrated a hazard ratio for survival of 1.7 (P < .0001) controlling for T3/T4 status (hazard ratio = 1.3, P < .01), non-epithelioid histology (hazard ratio = 1.7, P < .0001), extrapleural pneumonectomy (1.1, P = .4), and male gender (hazard ratio 1.4, P < .01).

Conclusion: This study confirms a preferential pattern of drainage of malignant pleural mesothelioma to N2 rather than N1 lymph nodes, but suggests that N1 only nodal involvement should be classified as lower stage disease. Multiple N2 nodal site involvement could potentially be classified as higher stage disease than single station N2. Our results emphasize the need for larger, confirmatory multicenter studies that could lead to revision of the current staging system.

Sørensen JB, Ravn J, Loft A, Brenøe J, Berthelsen AK; Nordic Mesothelioma Group.

Aaseboe U, Billing B, Bjørck T, Brodin O, Brunsvig P, Forsløw U, Frank H, Hansen O, Harving H, Hillerdal G, Jakobsen KD, Johansson A, Ladegaard L, Lindh B, Melgaard P, Mygind N, Månsson T, Palshof T, Sundstrøm S, Sørensen P, Vigander T.

Department of Oncology, Finsen Centre/National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. jens.benn.soerensen@rh.regionh.dk

Abstract

Objectives: Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) in MPM may be confined with both morbidity and mortality and careful preoperative staging identifying resectable patients is important. Staging is difficult and the accuracy of preoperative CT scan, 18F-FDG PET/CT scan (PET/CT), and mediastinoscopy is unclear. The objectives were to compare these staging techniques to each other and to surgical–pathological findings.

Methods: Patients had epithelial subtype MPM, age ≤70 years, and lung function test allowing pneumonectomy. Preoperative staging after 3–6 courses of induction chemotherapy included conventional CT scan, PET/CT, and mediastinoscopy. Surgical–pathological findings were compared to preoperative findings.

Results: Forty-two consecutive patients were without T4 or M on CT scan. PET/CT showed inoperability in 12 patients (29%) due to T4 (7 patients) and M1 (7 patients). Among 30 patients with subsequent mediastinoscopy, including 10 with N2/N3 on PET/CT, N2 were histologically verified
in 6 (20%). Among 24 resected patients, T4 occurred in 2 patients (8%), and N2 in 4 (17%), all being PET/CT negative. PET/CT accuracy of T4 and N2/N3 compared to combined histological results of mediastinoscopy and EPP showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 78% and 50%, 100% and 75%, 100% and 50%, 94% and 75%, not applicable and 5.0, and 0.22 and 0.67, respectively.

Conclusions: Non-curative surgery is avoided in 29% out of 42 MPM patients by preoperative PET/CT and in further 14% by mediastinoscopy. Even though both procedures are valuable, there are false negative findings with both, urging for even more accurate staging procedures.

Keywords: Mesothelioma; Staging; PET/CT scan; Mediastinoscopy; Extrapleural pneumonectomy

Plathow C, Staab A, Schmaehl A, Aschoff P, Zuna I, Pfannenberg C, Peter SH, Eschmann S, Klopp M.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. christian.plathow@uniklinik-freiburg.de

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the role of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), PET/CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the correct staging of patients with limited malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

Materials and Methods: Fifty-four patients with an epithelial MPM (34 men and 20 women) were included in this study. Patients were referred to our department for staging in a predicted resectable state (stage II/III). Within 3 days, PET/CT and MRI was performed in all patients. Images were evaluated by 3 specialists in the field of PET/CT and MRI. The subexaminations of PET/CT, PET, and CT were independently evaluated with respect to tumor stage. Subexaminations were compared with each other, with MRI and PET/CT. N-stage was verified by mediastinoscopy. Afterward, consensus reading was performed.

In 52 patients, surgery served as gold standard. In 2 patients, follow-up control served as gold standard as an inoperable situation with distant metastases was found. Additionally, interobserver variability ([kappa] value) was calculated.

Results: In stage II, accuracy was 0.77 (CT), 0.86 (PET), 0.8 (MRI), 1.0 (PET/CT), and in stage III 0.75, 0.83, 0.9, 1.0. PET/CT was significantly more accurate (P < 0.05) in stages II and III compared with all other techniques. CT and MRI were not able to detect distant metastases in 2 patients, which changed therapy (operable vs. inoperable). Interobserver variability was 0.7, 0.9, 0.8, 1.0 in stage II and 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 1.0 in stage III.

Conclusion: PET/CT makes it possible to stage patients with limited MPM with high accuracy and low interobserver variability.

Di Salvo M, Gambaro G, Pagella S, Manfredda I, Casadio C, Krengli M.

Radiotherapy, University of Piemonte Orientale-Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.

Abstract

Introduction: Literature data show that mesothelioma cells can implant along the surgical pathway of invasive procedures such as thoracotomy and thoracoscopy. We investigated the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy for preventing such malignant seeding.

Material and methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma were included in the present retrospective study. All patients underwent surgery and/or thoracoscopy for diagnosis, staging or talc pleurodesis. They were treated with electron external beam radiation therapy (21 Gy in 3 fractions over 1 week), directed to the surgical pathway after the invasive procedure. After completion of radiation treatment, 20 of 32 patients (63%) underwent chemotherapy.

Results: After a mean follow-up of 13.6 months (range 3-41) from the end of radiation therapy, no patient had tumour progression in the treated area. The treatment was well tolerated, as only erythema grade I (Radiation Therapy
Oncology Group, RTOG, scale) was noted in 11 patients. Seventeen patients died of disease with local progression after a mean survival time of 12.6 months (range 3-27); thirteen patients are alive with disease after a mean follow-up of 13.9 months (range 4-41); two patients are alive without evidence of disease after a mean follow-up of 16.50 months (range 6-27).

Discussion: The present study shows the efficacy and safety of local radiotherapy in preventing malignant seeding after thoracoscopy in patients with pleural mesothelioma although larger prospective trials are probably still needed to validate this treatment approach.

Kindler HL.

Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. hkindler@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu

Abstract

Systemic therapy is the only treatment option for the majority of mesothelioma patients, for whom age, co-morbid medical illnesses, non-epithelial histology, and locally advanced disease often preclude surgery. For many years, chemotherapy had a minimal impact on the natural history of this cancer, engendering considerable nihilism. Countless drugs were evaluated, most of which achieved response rates below 20% and median survival of <1 year. Several factors have hampered the evaluation of systemic regimens in patients with mesothelioma. The disease is uncommon, affecting only about 2500 Americans annually. Thus, most clinical trials are small, and randomized studies are challenging to accrue. There is significant heterogeneity within the patient populations of these small trials, for several reasons. Since all of the staging systems for mesothelioma are surgically based, it is almost impossible to accurately determine the stage of a patient who has not been resected. Patients
with very early stage disease may be lumped together with far more advanced patients in the same study. The disease itself is heterogenous, with many different prognostic factors, most notably three pathologic subtypes—epithelial, sarcomatoid, and biphasic—that have different natural histories, and varying responses to treatment. Finally, response assessment is problematic, since pleural-based lesions are difficult to measure accurately and reproducibly. Assessment criteria often vary between trials, making some cross-trial comparisons difficult to interpret. Despite these limitations, in recent years, there has been a surge of optimism regarding systemic treatment of this disease. Several cytotoxic agents have been shown to generate reproducible responses, improve quality of life, or prolong survival in mesothelioma. Drugs with single-agent activity include pemetrexed, raltitrexed, vinorelbine, and vinflunine. The addition of pemetrexed or raltitrexed to cisplatin prolongs survival.
The addition of cisplatin to pemetrexed, raltitrexed, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or vinorelbine improves response rate. The combination of pemetrexed plus cisplatin is considered the benchmark front-line regimen for this disease, based on a phase III trial in 456 patients that yielded a response rate of 41% and a median survival of 12.1 months. Vitamin supplementation with folic acid is essential to decrease toxicity, though recent data suggests that there may be an optimum dose of folic acid that should be administered; higher doses may diminish the effectiveness of pemetrexed. There are also several unresolved questions about the duration and timing of treatment with pemetrexed that are the subject of planned clinical trials. It is essential to recognize that the improvements observed with the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination, though real, are still modest. Other active drugs or drug combinations may be more appropriate for specific individuals, and further research is still needed
to improve upon these results. Since the majority of mesotheliomas in the United States occur in the elderly, non-cisplatin-containing pemetrexed combinations may be more appropriate for some patients. Now that effective agents have been developed for initial treatment, several classical cytotoxic drugs and many novel agents are being evaluated in the second-line setting. These include drugs targeted against the epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, src kinase, histone deacetylase, the proteasome, and mesothelin. Given the progress made in recent years, there is reason to believe that more effective treatments will continue to be developed.

Kent M, Rice D, Flores R.

Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Abstract

Opinion statement: The clinical presentation of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is nonspecific. The process to obtain the correct diagnosis can be challenging and requires a high index of suspicion. Once the diagnosis is made, there is no universally accepted standard of care and treatment decisions are strongly influenced by physician bias. Physicians who see few numbers of patients tend to treat based on symptoms alone by drainage of the pleural effusion and talc pleurodesis, while physicians at several tertiary referral centers tend to take an aggressive multimodality approach incorporating surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation. The primary goal of surgery in this setting is the resection of all gross disease. The choice of operation, extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or pleurectomy/decortication (P/D), depends on disease stage, pulmonary function, philosophy of the treating physician, and type of planned adjuvant therapy.