<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mesothelioma Journal Articles &#187; thoracoscopy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/category/type-of-assessment/diagnosis/thoracoscopy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles</link>
	<description>Journal Articles on Mesothelioma: Cancer Information for Patients and Families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Accuracy of diagnostic biopsy for the histological subtype of malignant pleural mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/26/accuracy-of-diagnostic-biopsy-for-the-histological-subtype-of-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/26/accuracy-of-diagnostic-biopsy-for-the-histological-subtype-of-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biphasic or Mixed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CT or CAT scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epithelioid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracotomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2011 Mar;6(3):602-5. [Link] Kao SC, Yan TD, Lee K, Burn J, Henderson DW, Klebe S, Kennedy C, Vardy J, Clarke S, van Zandwijk N, McCaughan BC. Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Bernie Banton Centre, Sydney, Australia. Abstract Introduction: Histological subtype is an established prognostic factor in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We retrospectively [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Journal of Thoracic Oncology</em>. 2011 Mar;6(3):602-5. [<a href="http://journals.lww.com/jto/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2011&amp;issue=03000&amp;article=00028&amp;type=abstract">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Kao SC, Yan TD, Lee K, Burn J, Henderson DW, Klebe S, Kennedy C, Vardy J, Clarke S, van Zandwijk N, McCaughan BC.</strong></p>
<p>Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Bernie Banton Centre, Sydney, Australia.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong> Histological  subtype is an established prognostic factor in malignant pleural  mesothelioma (MPM). We retrospectively investigated the accuracy of  classifying histological subtype on diagnostic biopsies and examined the  impact of different diagnostic procedures on the outcome.</p>
<p><strong>Methods: </strong> Consecutive  patients with histologically confirmed MPM who underwent extrapleural  pneumonectomy (EPP) from 1994 to 2009 were included. Patient records  were reviewed, and the initial diagnoses of histological subtype were  obtained. The archival EPP specimens were reviewed by a panel of  pathologists. The histological subtype obtained at review was compared  with the initial diagnosis.</p>
<p><strong>Results: </strong> Eighty-five patients  underwent EPP. Two patients achieved a pathological complete response  after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, leaving 83 patients to be included in  this review. Different diagnostic methods were used before EPP: 81%  thoracoscopy; 7% thoracotomy; 11% computed tomography-guided procedure;  and 1% other. Patients determined to have an epithelial subtype (n = 64)  at EPP were diagnosed correctly at initial diagnostic biopsy in 84% of  cases, whereas patients considered to have a biphasic subtype (n = 19)  at EPP were diagnosed correctly at diagnostic biopsy in 26% of cases.  The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic biopsy for epithelial MPM  was 93% and 31%, respectively. The overall subtype misclassification  rate was 20%. Biopsy by thoracotomy was most accurate in subtype  classification (83%) compared with thoracoscopy (74%) and computed  tomography-guided procedure (44%).</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The  determination of histological subtype from a diagnostic biopsy is  difficult due to sampling error, but an adequate specimen obtained from  surgical biopsy increases the accuracy of subtype classification  compared with radiological-guided biopsies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/26/accuracy-of-diagnostic-biopsy-for-the-histological-subtype-of-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinical-therapeutic management of thoracoscopy in pleural effusion: a groundbreaking technique in the twenty-first century</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/18/clinical-therapeutic-management-of-thoracoscopy-in-pleural-effusion-a-groundbreaking-technique-in-the-twenty-first-century/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/18/clinical-therapeutic-management-of-thoracoscopy-in-pleural-effusion-a-groundbreaking-technique-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural Effusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symptoms & Symptom Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinical &#38; Translational Oncology. 2011 Jan;13(1):57-60. [Link] Galbis JM, Mata M, Guijarro R, Esturi R, Figueroa S, Arnau A. Thoracic Surgery Service, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of non-affiliated pleural effusions (PE). Material and methods: A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Clinical &amp; Translational Oncology.</em> 2011 Jan;13(1):57-60. [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21239356">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Galbis JM, Mata M, Guijarro R, Esturi R, Figueroa S, Arnau A.</strong></p>
<p>Thoracic Surgery Service, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong>:  The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of  thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of non-affiliated pleural effusions (PE).  </p>
<p><strong>Material and methods</strong>: A five-year prospective study including data from  110 patients that were clinically diagnosed as benign (14.5%), malign  (34.5%) and non-affiliated (50.9%). PE in patents without oncology  disease and negative biopsy or cytology were considered as benign.  Malignant diagnosis was established according to a pleural biopsy,  compatible cytology and/or clinical features. Remaining cases were  considered as non-affiliated. Thoracoscopy was done under local  anaesthesia and sedation. </p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: Thoracoscopy confirmed previous  clinical diagnosis of benignity and malignity. Regarding non-affiliated  patients, 30.35% were diagnosed after thoracoscopy as unspecific  pleuritis, 17.86% mesothelioma and 1.79% pleural tuberculosis (TBC). The  other 48.21% of patients reported as non-affiliated were diagnosed with  pleural carcinoma. Statistical analysis did not reveal differences  between frequencies analysed. </p>
<p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: Our results indicate that  thoracoscopy is a cost-effective and reliable technique for obtaining  histological diagnosis in PE and also allows a directed pleurodesis if  indicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/18/clinical-therapeutic-management-of-thoracoscopy-in-pleural-effusion-a-groundbreaking-technique-in-the-twenty-first-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redo medical thoracoscopy is feasible in patients with pleural diseases &#8211; a series</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/18/redo-medical-thoracoscopy-is-feasible-in-patients-with-pleural-diseases-a-series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/18/redo-medical-thoracoscopy-is-feasible-in-patients-with-pleural-diseases-a-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interactive Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery. 2009 Mar;8(3):330-3. Epub 2008 Dec 16. [Link] Breen D, Fraticelli A, Greillier L, Mallawathantri S, Astoul P. Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine (Université de la Méditerranée), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France. Abstract Previous pleural endoscopy is considered to be a relative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Interactive Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery</em>. 2009 Mar;8(3):330-3. Epub 2008 Dec 16. [<a href="http://icvts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/8/3/330">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Breen D, Fraticelli A, Greillier L, Mallawathantri S, Astoul P.</strong></p>
<p>Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine (Université de la Méditerranée), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p>Previous pleural endoscopy is considered to be a relative contraindication to further medical thoracoscopy. We reviewed our experience in patients undergoing more than one thoracoscopy irrespective of the primary indication. From January 2001 to December 2006, patient baseline characteristics, endoscopic appearance and technique, volume of pleural fluid and final histological diagnosis were collated in all patients undergoing more than one thoracoscopy. The endpoints were morbidity and mortality related to the procedures, to compare the length of procedure time between pleural endoscopies in individual patients and the degree of difficulty of the second or subsequent thoracoscopic procedure. During this period, 29 patients underwent &#8216;redo&#8217; thoracoscopy resulting in a total of 61 procedures (rate of &#8216;redo&#8217; thoracoscopy; 9.1%). The mean time between thoracoscopies was 5.3+/-3.8 months. Although pleural adhesions were more common at the time of the subsequent procedure, it did not result in failure to induce a pneumothorax or perform the procedure. There was no difference in the duration of procedure between the primary and subsequent thoracoscopy (P=0.46), as well as no complications directly attributed to the repeat pleural endoscopy. Repeat medical thoracoscopy is technically feasible in patients with pleural disease without an associated increased morbidity and mortality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/18/redo-medical-thoracoscopy-is-feasible-in-patients-with-pleural-diseases-a-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malignant pleural mesothelioma: biology and diagnosis</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/26/malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-biology-and-diagnosis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/26/malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-biology-and-diagnosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serum Marker/Blood Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Revue des Maladies Respiratoires. 2008 Oct;25(8 Pt 2):3S183-90. [Link] Scherpereel A, Grigoriu BD, Astoul P. Service de Pneumologie et Oncologie Thoracique, Hôpital Calmette, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France. a-scherpereel@chru-lille.fr Abstract Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a serious issue worldwide because of its increasing incidence and poor prognosis despite real recent improvements in the disease management. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Revue des Maladies Respiratoires.</em> 2008 Oct;25(8 Pt 2):3S183-90. [<a href="http://www.em-consulte.com/article/183840" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Scherpereel A, Grigoriu BD, Astoul P.</strong></p>
<p>Service de Pneumologie et Oncologie Thoracique, Hôpital Calmette, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France. a-scherpereel@chru-lille.fr</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p>Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a serious issue worldwide because of its increasing incidence and poor prognosis despite real recent improvements in the disease management. Most of the patients are diagnosed late in the course of the disease when radical treatment is no more an option. Therefore an earlier diagnosis of MPM is needed to significantly increase the survival of patients. Some soluble markers, including soluble mesothelin and osteopontin, have been previously proposed for MPM diagnosis but none has been validated yet. Soluble mesothelin, assessed in blood and in pleural effusion, seems to be the most promising candidate. However, even if it has a good diagnostic and prognostic value, it is quite specific for the epithelioid subtype, the most frequent one of mesothelioma, thus limiting its usefulness in practice. Despite sometimes a good sensitivity, other potential markers as osteopontin are of little interest for MPM diagnosis because of a low specificity. In conclusion, the present data do not justify the use of biology for MPM diagnosis in routine yet but rather suggest a need for a continuing evaluation of soluble mesothelin in clinical studies and the search for other potential tumor markers.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong>    Mesothelioma, Tumor marker, Biology, Thoracoscopy, Pleural cancer  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/26/malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-biology-and-diagnosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semi-rigid thoracoscopy for undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a comparative study</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/10/31/semi-rigid-thoracoscopy-for-undiagnosed-exudative-pleural-effusions-a-comparative-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/10/31/semi-rigid-thoracoscopy-for-undiagnosed-exudative-pleural-effusions-a-comparative-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural Effusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symptoms & Symptom Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese Medical Journal. 2008 Aug 5;121(15):1384-9. [Link] Wang Z, Tong ZH, Li HJ, Zhao TT, Li XY, Xu LL, Luo J, Jin ML, Li RS, Wang C. Department of Respiratory Diseases, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Abstract Background: Thoracoscopy is highly sensitive and accurate for detecting pleural [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Chinese Medical Journal</em>. 2008 Aug 5;121(15):1384-9. [<a href="http://www.cmj.org/Periodical/paperlist.asp?id=LW2008731284690804984&amp;linkintype=pubmed" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Wang Z, Tong ZH, Li HJ, Zhao TT, Li XY, Xu LL, Luo J, Jin ML, Li RS, Wang C.</strong></p>
<p> Department of Respiratory Diseases, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p> <strong>Background</strong>: Thoracoscopy is highly sensitive and accurate for detecting pleural effusions. However, most respiratory physicians are not familiar with the use of the more common rigid thoracoscope or the flexible bronchoscope, which is difficult to manipulate within the pleural cavity. The semi-rigid thoracoscope combines the best features of the flexible and rigid instruments. Since the practice with this instrument is limited in China, the diagnostic utility of semi-rigid thoracoscopy (namely medical thoracoscopy) under local anesthesia for undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions was evaluated. </p>
<p><strong>Methods</strong>: In 50 patients with undiagnosed pleural effusions who were studied retrospectively, 23 received routine examinations between July 2004 and June 2005 and the rest 27 patients underwent medical thoracoscopy during July 2005 and June 2006. Routine examinations of the pleural effusions involved biochemistry and cytology, sputum cytology, and thoracentesis. The difference in diagnostic sensitivity, costs related to pleural fluid examination and complications were compared directly between the two groups. </p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: Medical thoracoscopy revealed tuberculous pleurisy in 6 patients, adenocarcinoma in 7, squamous-cell carcinoma in 2, metastatic carcinoma in 3, mesothelioma in 2, non-Hodgkin&#8217;s lymphoma in 1, and others in 4. Only 2 patients could not get definite diagnoses. Diagnostic efficiency of medical thoracoscopy was 93% (25/27). Only 21% patients were diagnosed after routine examinations, including parapneumonic effusion in 2 patients, lung cancer in 2 and undetermined metastatic malignancy in 1. Twelve patients with tuberculous pleurisy were suspected by routine examination. Costs related to pleural effusion testing showed no difference between the two groups (P=0.114). Twenty-three patients in the routine examination group underwent 97 times of thoracentesis. Two pleural infection patients and 2 pneumothorax patients were identified and received antibiotic treatment and drainage.<br />
  Medical thoracoscopy could be well tolerated by all the patients. The semi-rigid thoracoscope could be easily controlled by chest physicians. The most common complication was transient chest pain (20 of 27 patients) from the indwelling chest tube, which would be managed with conventional analgesics. One case of subcutaneous emphysema and 2 cases of postoperative fever were self-limiting. No severe complications occurred. </p>
<p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: Medical thoracoscopy is a simple, safe, and cost-effective tool, with a high positive rate. Physicians should extend its access to proper patients if the facilities for medical thoracoscopy are available.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: medical thoracoscopy, pleural effusion, semirigid thoracoscope, diagnosis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/10/31/semi-rigid-thoracoscopy-for-undiagnosed-exudative-pleural-effusions-a-comparative-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prevention of malignant seeding at drain sites after invasive procedures (surgery and/or thoracoscopy) by hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/09/06/prevention-of-malignant-seeding-at-drain-sites-after-invasive-procedures-surgery-andor-thoracoscopy-by-hypofractionated-radiotherapy-in-patients-with-pleural-mesothelioma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/09/06/prevention-of-malignant-seeding-at-drain-sites-after-invasive-procedures-surgery-andor-thoracoscopy-by-hypofractionated-radiotherapy-in-patients-with-pleural-mesothelioma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural Biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acta Oncologica. 2008;47(6):1094-8. [Link] Di Salvo M, Gambaro G, Pagella S, Manfredda I, Casadio C, Krengli M. Radiotherapy, University of Piemonte Orientale-Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy. Abstract Introduction: Literature data show that mesothelioma cells can implant along the surgical pathway of invasive procedures such as thoracotomy and thoracoscopy. We investigated the use of hypofractionated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Acta Oncologica</em>. 2008;47(6):1094-8. [<a href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/02841860701754182" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Di Salvo M, Gambaro G, Pagella S, Manfredda I, Casadio C, Krengli M.</strong></p>
<p> Radiotherapy, University of Piemonte Orientale-Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract </h3>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong>: Literature data show that mesothelioma cells can implant along the surgical pathway of invasive procedures such as thoracotomy and thoracoscopy. We investigated the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy for preventing such malignant seeding. </p>
<p><strong>Material and methods</strong>: Thirty-two consecutive patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma were included in the present retrospective study. All patients underwent surgery and/or thoracoscopy for diagnosis, staging or talc pleurodesis. They were treated with electron external beam radiation therapy (21 Gy in 3 fractions over 1 week), directed to the surgical pathway after the invasive procedure. After completion of radiation treatment, 20 of 32 patients (63%) underwent chemotherapy. </p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: After a mean follow-up of 13.6 months (range 3-41) from the end of radiation therapy, no patient had tumour progression in the treated area. The treatment was well tolerated, as only erythema grade I (Radiation Therapy<br />
  Oncology Group, RTOG, scale) was noted in 11 patients. Seventeen patients died of disease with local progression after a mean survival time of 12.6 months (range 3-27); thirteen patients are alive with disease after a mean follow-up of 13.9 months (range 4-41); two patients are alive without evidence of disease after a mean follow-up of 16.50 months (range 6-27). </p>
<p><strong>Discussion</strong>: The present study shows the efficacy and safety of local radiotherapy in preventing malignant seeding after thoracoscopy in patients with pleural mesothelioma although larger prospective trials are probably still needed to validate this treatment approach. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/09/06/prevention-of-malignant-seeding-at-drain-sites-after-invasive-procedures-surgery-andor-thoracoscopy-by-hypofractionated-radiotherapy-in-patients-with-pleural-mesothelioma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soft tissue sarcoma metastatic to pleura</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/08/14/soft-tissue-sarcoma-metastatic-to-pleura/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/08/14/soft-tissue-sarcoma-metastatic-to-pleura/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural Biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarcomatoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuberkuloz ve Toraks. 2008 Apr;56(2):197-200. [Link] Yildirim H, Metıntaş M, Ak G, Dündar E, Ergınel S. Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey. heylul2002@yahoo.com. Abstract Almost all cancers can cause distant pleural metastases. However, pleural metastases of soft tissue sarcoma that constitute less than 1% of adult solid malignancy are extremely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Tuberkuloz ve Toraks</em>. 2008 Apr;56(2):197-200. [<a href="http://www.journalagent.com/pubmed/linkout.asp?ISSN=0494-1373&amp;PMID=18701980" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Yildirim H, Metıntaş M, Ak G, Dündar E, Ergınel S.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey. heylul2002@yahoo.com.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p>Almost all cancers can cause distant pleural metastases. However, pleural metastases of soft tissue sarcoma that constitute less than 1% of adult solid malignancy are extremely rare. It is very difficult to distinguish them form sarcomatous malignant mesothelioma on histopathological features. We report a 57 year-old man who presented to us with left chest pain and progressive dyspnea and was diagnosed to have a pleural metastases of soft tissue sarcoma by thoracoscopic biopsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/08/14/soft-tissue-sarcoma-metastatic-to-pleura/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full-thickness pleural biopsy using an Insulation-tipped Diathermic knife in a patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/08/14/full-thickness-pleural-biopsy-using-an-insulation-tipped-diathermic-knife-in-a-patient-with-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/08/14/full-thickness-pleural-biopsy-using-an-insulation-tipped-diathermic-knife-in-a-patient-with-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural Biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kyobu Geka. 2008 Aug;61(9):769-73. [Link] Sasada S, Kawahara K, Okamoto N, Kobayashi M, Iwasaki T, Michida T, Suzuki H, Hirashima T, Matsu K, Ohta M, Ishida A, Miyazawa T. Department of Thoracic Malignancy, Osaka Prefectural Medical Center for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Habikino, Japan. Abstract A 72-year-old woman was pointed out a right pleural effusion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Kyobu Geka</em>. 2008 Aug;61(9):769-73. [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18697458?dopt=AbstractPlus" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Sasada S, Kawahara K, Okamoto N, Kobayashi M, Iwasaki T, Michida T, Suzuki H, Hirashima T, Matsu K, Ohta M, Ishida A, Miyazawa T.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Thoracic Malignancy, Osaka Prefectural Medical Center for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Habikino, Japan.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p>A 72-year-old woman was pointed out a right pleural effusion and thickening pleura on the chest computed tomography. The patient underwent semiflexible thoracoscopy under local anesthesia at the endoscopy room. The patient was placed in the lateral decubitus position, and flexible trocar was inserted with the single puncture technique. At the macroscopic findings, the parietal pleura were thickened prominently, and patchy plaques were occasionally recognized. A standard biopsy forceps hardly grasped pleura because of presence of scar, so we performed pleural biopsy using Insulation-tipped Diathermic (IT) knife. A subpleural injection of saline containing 0.5% lidokine and 0.005% epinephrine was performed for raising the affected parietal pleura with an injection needle. After a pin hole was made, the pleural lesion was incised in a circle by manipulating the IT knife, and the incised pleura were removed. Pathology revealed extensive fibrosis and epithelial mesothelioma by the<br />
specimen. This biopsy technique using IT knife through semiflexible thoracoscopy enabled to obtain a full-thickness pleura It is thought to be useful for the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in which standard forceps are difficult to grasp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/08/14/full-thickness-pleural-biopsy-using-an-insulation-tipped-diathermic-knife-in-a-patient-with-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malignant mesothelioma: current status and perspective in Japan and the world</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/07/09/malignant-mesothelioma-current-status-and-perspective-in-japan-and-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/07/09/malignant-mesothelioma-current-status-and-perspective-in-japan-and-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleurectomy/decortication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trimodality Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2008 Jul;56(7):317-23. Epub 2008 Jul 8. [Link] Hasegawa S, Tanaka F. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, 663-8501, Japan, hasegawa@hyo-med.ac.jp. Abstract Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is associated with a poor prognosis; and to make things worse, its incidence is increasing throughout the world. Surgical management [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	<em>General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery</em>. 2008 Jul;56(7):317-23. Epub 2008 Jul 8. [<a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/h385732k211101g3/" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Hasegawa S, Tanaka F.</strong></p>
<p> Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, 663-8501, Japan, hasegawa@hyo-med.ac.jp.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract </h3>
<p>Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is associated with a poor prognosis; and to make things worse, its incidence is increasing throughout the world. Surgical management of MPM is comprised of two aspects: diagnosis and resection. Surgical biopsy with thoracoscopy provides a higher yield but a higher rate of tumor cell seeding than blind biopsy. In some surgical cases, extended surgical staging with mediastinoscopy, laparoscopy, and contralateral thoracoscopy is required for the preoperative evaluation for resectablity. There are two types of surgical resection for MPM. Pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) involves removal of as much of the visceral, parietal, and pericardial pleura and the tumor as possible without removing the underlying lung. Because P/D is less radical but less invasive compared to extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), it can be tolerated by poor-risk patients. EPP comprises en bloc resection of visceral, parietal, and pericardial pleura and adjacent components such as ipsilateral  lung, pericardium, and diaphragm, without opening the pleural cavity. EPP was considred a highly dangerous procedure with a surgical mortality of more than 30% decades ago, but its current operative mortality/morbidity rates are 4%-9% and 60%, respectively. As macroscopic complete resection is the primary goal of surgery for MPM because of its diffuse intrapleural growth, surgical resection alone is associated with poor survival. In this context, combination therapy with surgery plus chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is currently considered the standard treatment for patients with respectable MPM. A national survey of EPP was conducted recently in Japan, and a few multicenter clinical trials will start soon</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong>  Malignant pleural mesothelioma &#8211; Pleurectomy &#8211; Extrapleural pneumonectomy &#8211; Chemotherapy &#8211; Multimodality treatment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/07/09/malignant-mesothelioma-current-status-and-perspective-in-japan-and-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response of a Patient with Pleural and Peritoneal Mesothelioma after Second-Line Chemotherapy with Lipoplatin and Gemcitabine</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/06/05/response-of-a-patient-with-pleural-and-peritoneal-mesothelioma-after-second-line-chemotherapy-with-lipoplatin-and-gemcitabine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/06/05/response-of-a-patient-with-pleural-and-peritoneal-mesothelioma-after-second-line-chemotherapy-with-lipoplatin-and-gemcitabine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisplatin (Platinol ®)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epithelioid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemcitabine (Gemzar)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural Biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symptoms & Symptom Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoracoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vinorelbine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oncology. 2007;73:426-429. [Link] Karpathiou G, Argiana E, Koutsopoulos A, Froudarakis ME. Department of Pneumonology, Medical School Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece. Abstract We report the case of a 56-year-old patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma of epithelial type, who responded to second-line chemotherapy with lipoplatin plus gemcitabine. Diagnosis and staging of the disease was done [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Oncology. </em>2007;73:426-429. [<a href="http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&#038;file=000136800" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Karpathiou G, Argiana E, Koutsopoulos A, Froudarakis ME.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Pneumonology, Medical School Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.</p>
<h3>Abstract </h3>
<p>We report the case of a 56-year-old patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma of epithelial type, who responded to second-line chemotherapy with lipoplatin plus gemcitabine. Diagnosis and staging of the disease was done by medical thoracoscopy with biopsies of the right pleura in December 2003, when he was treated with talc pleurodesis. Eighteen months later, he presented with pleural effusion of the left side and underwent first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin plus vinorelbine. After 8 cycles, the patient presented renal toxicity limiting further cisplatinum chemotherapy and disease progression with peritoneal invasion of the tumor and ascites. Treatment with lipoplatin-gemcitabine was decided on in November 2006, and the patient showed important improvement in the clinical status and peritoneal effusion. He survived for 36 weeks, with symptom-free survival of 34 weeks.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Lipoplatin, Gemcitabine, Mesothelioma, Second-line chemotherapy, Thoracoscopy, Cisplatin, Vinorelbine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/06/05/response-of-a-patient-with-pleural-and-peritoneal-mesothelioma-after-second-line-chemotherapy-with-lipoplatin-and-gemcitabine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

