<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mesothelioma Journal Articles &#187; Peritonectomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/category/peritonectomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles</link>
	<description>Journal Articles on Mesothelioma: Cancer Information for Patients and Families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Indication of Peritonectomy for Peritoneal Dissemination</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/13/indication-of-peritonectomy-for-peritoneal-dissemination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/13/indication-of-peritonectomy-for-peritoneal-dissemination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritonectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2010 Nov;37(12):2306-2311. [Link] Yonemura Y, Tsukiyama G, Miyata R, Sako S, Endou Y, Hirano M, Mizumoto A, Matsuda T, Takao N, Ichinose M, Miura M, Hagiwara A, Li Y. NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment. Abstract A total of 521 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) were treated by peritonectomy and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Gan To Kagaku Ryoho</em>. 2010 Nov;37(12):2306-2311. [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21224556">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Yonemura Y, Tsukiyama G, Miyata R, Sako S, Endou Y, Hirano M, Mizumoto A, Matsuda T, Takao N, Ichinose M, Miura M, Hagiwara A, Li Y.</strong></p>
<p>NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p>A total of 521 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) were treated  by peritonectomy and perioperative chemotherapy. Each of the 95, 58,  316, 31, 10 and 11 patients were from gastric, colorectal, appendiceal,  ovarian, small bowel cancer and mesothelioma, respectively. The  distribution and volume of PC are recorded by the Sugarbaker peritoneal  carcinomatosis index( PCI). Peritonectomy was performed with a radical  resection of the primary tumor and all gross PC with involved organs,  peritoneum, or tissue that was deemed technically feasible and safe for  the patient. The postoperative major complication of grade 3 was found  in 14%, and total 30 &#8211; day mortality was 2.7%. The survival of gastric  cancer patients with a PCI score &le; 6 was significantly better than those  with a PCI score &ge; 7. In appendiceal neoplasm, patients with PCI score  less than 28 showed significantly better survival than those with PCI  score greater than 29. The survival of colorectal cancer patients with a  PCI score &ge; 11 was significantly poorer than those with a PCI score &le;  10. Among the various prognostic factors in appendiceal neoplasm and  gastric cancer patients, CC &#8211; 0 complete cytoreduction was the most  important independent prognostic factor. Peritonectomy is done to remove  macroscopic disease and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy to  eradicate microscopic residual disease aiming to remove disease  completely with a single procedure. Peritonectomy combined with  perioperative chemotherapy may achieve long &#8211; term survival in a  selected group of patients with PC. The higher mortality rate underlines  this necessarily strict selection that should be reserved to  experienced institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/13/indication-of-peritonectomy-for-peritoneal-dissemination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma: the Australian experience</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/17/outcomes-of-cytoreductive-surgery-and-hyperthermic-intraperitoneal-chemotherapy-for-peritoneal-mesothelioma-the-australian-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/17/outcomes-of-cytoreductive-surgery-and-hyperthermic-intraperitoneal-chemotherapy-for-peritoneal-mesothelioma-the-australian-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritonectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor Debulking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2009 Feb 1;99(2):109-13. [Link] Chua TC, Yan TD, Morris DL. Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Abstract Aims: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rapidly progressing malignancy with a median survival of 6-12 months. Palliative surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are futile and have not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Journal of Surgical Oncology</em>. 2009 Feb 1;99(2):109-13. [<a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121519969/abstract?CRETRY=1&amp;SRETRY=0" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Chua TC, Yan TD, Morris DL.</strong></p>
<p> Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, Australia.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Aims:</strong>  Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rapidly progressing malignancy with a median survival of 6-12 months. Palliative surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are futile and have not shown to improve survival. This paper reports the outcomes of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of this disease.</p>
<p><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong>  An observational study of 20 patients with peritoneal mesothelioma treated with CRS and HIPEC at the St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison using the Log Rank test.</p>
<p><strong>Results:</strong>  There were six females. The mean age was 55.7 (9.0) years. The median survival was 29.5 (0.46-87.2) months with 1- and 3-year survival of 78.2% and 46.3%, respectively. Survival was found to be influenced by completeness of cytoreduction (P = 0.02) and histological subtype (P = 0.01). Patients with epitheloid peritoneal mesothelioma who had a CC0 had a median survival of 87.2 months.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong>  CRS and HIPEC is a treatment option for peritoneal mesothelioma. Patients with epithelioid tumor who undergo complete cytoreduction may potentially benefit from this procedure.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, mesothelioma, peritoneal neoplasms, peritonectomy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/17/outcomes-of-cytoreductive-surgery-and-hyperthermic-intraperitoneal-chemotherapy-for-peritoneal-mesothelioma-the-australian-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long-term results of peritonectomy on the patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/01/29/long-term-results-of-peritonectomy-on-the-patients-with-peritoneal-carcinomatosis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/01/29/long-term-results-of-peritonectomy-on-the-patients-with-peritoneal-carcinomatosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritonectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor Debulking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/01/29/long-term-results-of-peritonectomy-on-the-patients-with-peritoneal-carcinomatosis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2007 Nov;34(12):1926-30.[Link] Yonemura Y, Ikeno T, Shinbo M, Maejima S, Hagiwara A, Endou Y, Masahiro M, Ogura S; Peritoneal Surface Malignancy; Treatment Group. Dept. of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Kishiwada Tokushukai-Hospital. Abstract Peritonectomy was done for 125 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC): 19-pseudomyxomaperitonei (PMP), 15-appendiceal carcinoma (AC), 20-colorectal cancer, 67-gastric cancer, 2-small bowel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Gan To Kagaku Ryoho</em>. 2007 Nov;34(12):1926-30.[<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219855?dopt=AbstractPlus">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Yonemura Y, Ikeno T, Shinbo M, Maejima S, Hagiwara A, Endou Y, Masahiro M, Ogura S; Peritoneal Surface Malignancy; Treatment Group.</strong></p>
<p>Dept. of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Kishiwada Tokushukai-Hospital.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p>Peritonectomy was done for 125 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC): 19-pseudomyxomaperitonei (PMP), 15-appendiceal carcinoma (AC), 20-colorectal cancer, 67-gastric cancer, 2-small bowel cancer and 2-peritoneal mesothelioma. Cytoreduction by the standard techniques was done in 130 patients with PC. Complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was achieved in 85 of 125 (68%) patients, who have undergone peritonectomy, but was performed only in 28 of 130 (21%) by the standard surgical techniques. CC-0 could be done to patients with peritoneal cancer indices (PCI) of less than 14. A Cox model showed that significant prognostic factors are CC-0, and the patients were younger than 66 years old. Accordingly, peritonectomy increased the incidence of CC-0, and may have improved the prognosis of patients with PC. Peritonectomy is recommended for patients with PMP, AC and colorectal cancer. In gastric cancer, it is indicated for patients with PCI less than 14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/01/29/long-term-results-of-peritonectomy-on-the-patients-with-peritoneal-carcinomatosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

