Zucali PA, Giovannetti E, Destro A, Mencoboni M, Ceresoli GL, Gianoncelli L, Lorenzi E, De Vincenzo F, Simonelli M, Perrino M, Bruzzone A, Thunnissen E, Tunesi G, Giordano L, Roncalli M, Peters GJ, Santoro A.

Department of Oncology, Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. paolo.zucali@humanitas.it

Abstract

Purpose: The pemetrexed/platinum agent combination represents the standard of care in first-line treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, there are no established indicators of responsiveness that can be used to optimize the treatment. This retrospective study aimed to assess the role of excision repair cross-complementing group-1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) in tumors, and correlate expression levels and polymorphisms of these key determinants of drug activity with the outcome of MPM patients treated with carboplatin/pemetrexed in first-line setting. Experimental design: Analysis of TS and ERCC1 polymorphisms, mRNA and protein expression was done by PCR and immunohistochemistry [with the H-score (histologic score)] in tumor specimens from 126 MPM patients, including 99 carboplatin-/pemetrexed-treated patients.

Results: A significant correlation between low TS protein expression and disease control (DC) to carboplatin/pemetrexed therapy (P = 0.027), longer progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.017), and longer overall survival (OS; P = 0.022) was found when patients were categorized according to median H-score. However, patients with the higher tertile of TS mRNA expression correlated with higher risk of developing progressive disease (P = 0.022), shorter PFS (P < 0.001), and shorter OS (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, the higher tertile of TS mRNA level and TS H-score confirmed their independent prognostic role for DC, PFS, and OS. No significant associations were found among ERCC1 protein expression, TS and ERCC1 polymorphisms, and clinical outcome.

Conclusions: In our series of carboplatin-/pemetrexed-treated MPM patients, low TS protein and mRNA levels were significantly associated to DC, improved PFS, and OS. Prospective trials for the validation of the prognostic/predictive role of TS in MPM patients treated with pemetrexed-based regimens are warranted.

Ceresoli GL, Zucali PA, De Vincenzo F, Gianoncelli L, Simonelli M, Lorenzi E, Ripa C, Giordano L, Santoro A.

Oncology Unit, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy; Department of Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.

Abstract

The role of second-line therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) progressing after first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (PBC) is currently undefined. Recent case series have suggested a possible role of re-treatment with PBC. In this observational study, the activity and safety of this therapeutic option was assessed in a consecutive series of cases. Patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) lasting for at least 3 months after first-line PBC were retreated with PBC, either as second-line (2L) or further-line (>2L) therapy. Descriptive analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate and toxicity are reported. Between October 2004 and July 2009, 31 patients (21 males and 10 females) received re-treatment with PBC as 2L (18 patients) or beyond 2L therapy (13 patients). Median age was 65 years (range 37-81). Fifteen patients were re-treated with pemetrexed alone, and 16 with a pemetrexed/platinum combination. An objective response was achieved in 6 patients (one CR and 5 PRs), for a response rate of 19%. Nine patients (29%) had SD after treatment. Overall, the disease control rate (DCR) was 48%. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) after re-treatment with PBC were 3.8 months and 10.5 months, respectively. PFS and OS after re-treatment with PBC were correlated with PFS achieved after first-line PBC (FL-PFS). Patients with a FL-PFS >12 months had a median PFS after re-treatment of 5.5 months, while patients with a FL-PFS =12 months had a median PFS after re-treatment of 2.5 months; no patient in this group was progression-free at 1 year. Toxicity was mild, with grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity occurring in 9.7% of patients. In conclusion, re-treatment with PBC should be considered as second-line therapy in MPM patients achieving a durable (>12 months) disease control with first-line PBC. Further prospective evaluation of this therapeutic option is warranted.

Keywords: Malignant pleural mesothelioma; Second-line therapy; Pemetrexed; Re-treatment; Progression-free survival; Disease control.

Dickgreber NJ, Fink TH, Latz JE, Hossain AM, Musib LC, Thomas M.

Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. nicolas.dickgreber@gmx.de

Abstract

Purpose: Pemetrexed is approved as monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin. The established combination dose was identified before the addition of folic acid and vitamin B₁₂ to the treatment regimen. We evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of higher pemetrexed doses with cisplatin and vitamin supplementation.

Experimental Design: Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or non–small cell lung cancer received pemetrexed doses from 500 to 900 mg/m² + 75 mg/m² cisplatin once every 21 days. Folic acid and vitamin B₁₂ were administered per label recommendations.

Results: Twenty-one patients received a combined total of 84 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was 900 mg/m² pemetrexed + 75 mg/m² cisplatin. Dose-limiting toxicities at this dose included grade 3 anemia, bronchopneumonia, and neutropenia, and 1 death from sepsis secondary to grade 4 febrile neutropenia, considered possibly related to study drugs. The recommended dose was 800 mg/m² pemetrexed + 75 mg/m² cisplatin. Pemetrexed PK were consistent across doses; pemetrexed did not seem to affect total or free platinum PK.

Conclusions: Pemetrexed with vitamin supplementation was safe and well tolerated at higher doses than the currently established 500 mg/m² + 75 mg/m² cisplatin. Based on this study, the recommended dose would be 800 mg/m² pemetrexed + 75 mg/m² cisplatin. However, recent studies showed a lack of improved efficacy for 900 or 1,000 mg/m² single-agent pemetrexed versus 500 mg/m² and a lack of PK/pharmacodynamic exposure-response relationship for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination across pemetrexed exposures corresponding to this dose range. Based on currently available evidence, we recommend retaining the established dose.

Xanthopoulos A, Bauer TT, Blum TG, Kollmeier J, Schönfeld N, Serke M.

Respiratory Diseases Clinic Heckeshorn, Department of Pneumology, HELIOS Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany. torsten.bauer@helios-kliniken.de.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin +/- gemcitabine in patients with diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) pretreated with pemetrexed.

Methods: The study enrolled consecutive patients with relapsed MPM, all of them pretreated with a platin-pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 was administered as monotherapy or in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 given on day 1 and 8. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. The primary endpoints were response rate and disease control rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to tumour progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and toxicity.

Results: Between February 2005 and September 2007 29 patients (median age: 65.0 years, World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status: 0-3) were enrolled. The follow-up period encompassed 5.4 to 97.4 weeks (median: 24.3 weeks). Out of these 29 patients, 15 were treated in second, 10 in third, 3 in fourth and 1 in fifth line, respectively. The majority of the patients received the combination oxaliplatin and gemcitabine (n = 25 vs. 4; 86.2 vs. 13.8%).The median overall survival (OS) was 71.7 weeks (30.6-243.3 weeks), whereas survival from the start of oxaliplatin/gemcitabine-treatment was 24.3 weeks (5.4-97.3 weeks). Median time to tumour progression (TTP) was 9.3 weeks (3.0-67.6 weeks).Partial response (PR) was observed in 2 patients (6.9%), stable disease (SD) for at least three courses of treatment in 11 patients (37.9%). Thus, disease control rate was 44.8%, whereas 16 of 29 patients exhibited progressive disease (55.2%).The toxicity profile was favourable, with no WHO grade 4-toxicities, only few dose-reductions were performed due to non-symptomatic haematotoxicities (neutropenia, thrombopenia). Mild WHO grade 2 neurotoxicity was seen in 6 patients.

Conclusion: Pemetrexed-pretreated patients with progressive MPM may benefit from a consecutive chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and gemcitabine without significant toxicity.

Carteni G, Manegold C, Garcia GM, Siena S, Zielinski CC, Amadori D, Liu Y, Blatter J, Visseren-Grul C, Stahel R.

Cardarelli Hospital, Medical Oncology, Via Cardarelli 9, 80100 Naples, Italy. giacomo.carteni@ospedalecardarelli.it

Abstract

Aim: Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) has rarely been studied. The Expanded Access Program (EAP) provided access to 109 patients with PM.

Methods: This was a nonrandomized, open-label study conducted in chemo-naïve or previously treated patients with PM not amenable to curative surgery. Patients received pemetrexed (PEM) 500mg/m2 alone or with cisplatin (CIS) 75mg/m2 or carboplatin (CARBO) AUC 5 every 21 days, supplemented with standard vitamin B12, folate, and dexamethasone.

Results: Response rates (95% CI) for PEM, PEM/CIS, and PEM/CARBO were 12.5% (3.5, 29.0), 20.0% (7.7, 38.6), and 24.1% (10.3, 43.5), respectively. Median survival for PEM was 10.3 months. One-year survival rates for PEM/CIS and PEM were 57.4% (95% CI: 10.3, 100) and 41.5% (95% CI: 4.6, 78.4), respectively, and were not available for PEM/CARBO. Anemia was the most common serious adverse event (6.4%). Neutropenia (34.6%) was the most frequent CTC grade 3 or 4 toxicity reported.

Concluding statement: PEM with or without a platinum agent was both active and well tolerated in patients with peritoneal mesothelioma.

Keywords: Peritoneal mesothelioma, Pemetrexed, Platinum, Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Compassionate-use program, Expanded Access Program (EAP).

Berghmans T.

Département des Soins Intensifs et Oncologie Thoracique, Institut Jules-Bordet (Centre des Tumeurs de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles), 1 Rue Héger-Bordet, Brussels, Belgium. thierry.berghmanns@bordet.be

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumour of poor prognosis. Available therapeutics have restricted efficacy. Pleuro-pneumonectomy is the only treatment with curative intent but it could be offered to a limited and well selected group of patients. The role of radiotherapy is palliative and its preventive role on malignant seeding after invasive procedures is controversial. There are few active cytotoxic drugs in this disease. Currently, based on two randomised trials, the most efficacious chemotherapy regimen consists in a combination of cisplatin and an antifolate agent, pemetrexed or raltitrexed.

Keywords: Mesothelioma, Surgery, Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy

Saito Y, Furukawa T, Arano Y, Fujibayashi Y, Saga T.

Molecular Imaging Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.

Abstract

Introduction: Various techniques are available for in vivo imaging, and precise understanding of their characteristics is essential for effective use of the imaging results. We established human mesothelioma cell lines expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) and examined their fluorescence intensity and uptake of positron emission tomography (PET) tracer analogs to compare their characteristics and assess their usefulness in the evaluation of therapeutics.

Method: A human mesothelioma cell line was stably transfected to express RFP. Fluorescence, cell number and protein amount were measured during cell growth and treatment with cytotoxic reagents. In in vivo experiments, RFP-expressing cells were injected subcutaneously or into the pleural cavity of nude mice, and fluorescence images were taken with or without pemetrexed treatment. The uptake of [³H]3′-deoxy-3′-fluorothymidine ([³H]FLT) and [¹⁴C]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ([¹⁴C]FDG) under treatment with the above reagents in vitro and in vivo were examined.

Results: Strong correlation was observed between fluorescence intensity and total cell number with or without cytotoxic treatment. The uptake of [³H]FLT and [¹⁴C]FDG decreased rapidly after the initiation of treatment with actinomycin D or cycloheximide. When treated with pemetrexed, the uptake of [³H]FLT temporarily increased. The cells formed subcutaneous and orthotopic tumors, with fluorescence intensity correlating with tumor volume. The correlation was sustained under pemetrexed treatment. The uptake of [³H]FLT in vivo increased significantly early after pemetrexed treatment.

Conclusion: Fluorescence imaging could be used to semiquantitatively monitor tumor size, whereas PET could be used to monitor tumor response to therapeutic treatments, and especially, FLT might be a good marker of the response to anti-folate chemotherapeutics.

Keywords: Mesothelioma; Mouse tumor model; Fluorescence imaging; PET; FLT

Lee CW, Murray N, Anderson H, Rao SC, Bishop W.

BC Cancer Agency – Fraser Valley Centre, 13750 96th Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3V 1Z2. clee@bccancer.bc.ca

Abstract

Cisplatin plus pemetrexed has been standard systemic therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) since the landmark randomized trial reported in 2003. However, the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine was incorporated into clinical practice following publication of promising phase II trial results in 1999. The impact of these platinum-based regimens is assessed in this review of practice in the province of British Columbia. All cases of MPM diagnosed from 1999 to 2005 were identified in a provincial registry using ICD-O codes. The clinical records of individuals referred to the BC Cancer Agency were reviewed, and those treated with a platinum analog plus gemcitabine or pemetrexed as first-line therapy were included in survival analyses. During the selected period, 81 patients were treated first-line with a platinum analog plus gemcitabine (n=40) or pemetrexed (n=41). Characteristics of the entire cohort include: age at diagnosis, mean 65 years (median 66, range 43-84); gender, male 70 (86%); laterality of disease, right-sided 51 (63%); histology, epithelioid or not otherwise specified 69 (85%). Median survival was 10 months (95% confidence interval, 7.7-12.3), with 1- and 2-year survival rates 0.42 and 0.21, respectively. Survival did not appear to be influenced by the chemotherapy agent used. Survival outcomes with chemotherapy for MPM in the province are comparable to what is reported in the literature. No difference is seen combining platinum analogs with gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Platinum-based doublets might represent a therapeutic ceiling for cytotoxic chemotherapy in MPM.

Hanauske AR, Dumez H, Piccart M, Yilmaz E, Graefe T, Gil T, Simms L, Musib L, Awada A.

St. Georg Hospital, Ahrensburger Weg 129b, 22359, Hamburg, Germany, hanauskeax@lilly.com.

Abstract

The objectives of this phase I study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RD), antitumor activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed–paclitaxel combination. Patients (N = 95) with advanced solid tumors were assigned to three schedules (21-day cycles [q21d]). Starting doses for each schedule of pemetrexed and paclitaxel, respectively, were: (S1) 400 and 135 mg/m2 on d1; (S2) 400 mg/m2 d1 and 40 mg/m2 d1 and d8; S3) 400 mg/m2 d8 and 30 mg/m2 d1 and d8. MTD was 500/135 mg/m2 (S1), 400/40 mg/m2 (S2), and 500/120 mg/m2 (S3). Most common dose limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia, fatigue, and neuromotor toxicities. Most common toxicity was grade 3/4 lymphopenia. Four patients had partial response, 43 patients had stable disease. The RD determined was pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (d8) and paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (d1 and d8), q21d. The combination was well tolerated and showed efficacy in thyroid carcinoma and mesothelioma.

Keywords: Pemetrexed – Paclitaxel – Phase I – Combination chemotherapy – Vitamin supplementation

Li L, Razak AR, Hughes A.

Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment (NCCT), Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer. Chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed can improve overall survival but has a toxic profile. Substitution of cisplatin with carboplatin may avoid some potential side-effects. Therefore, we undertook a retrospective review to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of carboplatin and pemetrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in clinical practice.

Methods: Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who had been treated with carboplatin and pemetrexed were retrospectively identified from pharmacy databases. The endpoints were disease control rate, time to treatment failure, clinical improvement rate and overall survival. We also evaluated any significant haematological and non-haematological toxicities.

Results: A total of 49 patients were identified. Of 45 evaluable cases, the disease control rate was achieved in 34 patients (69%, 95% CI 55–82, intention to treat analysis). The clinical response rate was achieved in 34 out of 49 patients (69%, 95% CI 55–82). The median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI 3.4–5.8) and median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI 9.5–18.5). Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were observed in 7 patients (14.3%). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities were seen in 12 patients (24.5%). No toxic deaths were recorded.

Conclusion: The combination of carboplatin and pemetrexed may be a viable option in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Keywords: Pleural; Mesothelioma; Pemetrexed; Carboplatin; Chemotherapy; Disease control; Retrospective; Survival

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MPM, malignant pleural mesothelioma; IMIG, International Mesothelioma Interest Group; AUC, area under the curve; i.v., intravenous; DCR, disease control rate; CT, computed tomography; TTF, time to treatment failure; OS, overall survival