<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mesothelioma Journal Articles &#187; Determining Efficacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/category/determining-efficacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles</link>
	<description>Journal Articles on Mesothelioma: Cancer Information for Patients and Families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Targeted therapies in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a review of clinical studies</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/26/targeted-therapies-in-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-a-review-of-clinical-studies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/26/targeted-therapies-in-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-a-review-of-clinical-studies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Angiogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisplatin (Platinol ®)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EGFR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anticancer Drugs. 2011 Mar;22(3):199-205. [Link] Greillier L, Marco S, Barlesi F. Service d&#8217;Oncologie Multidisciplinaire et Innovations Thérapeutiques, Université de la Méditerranée-Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France. Abstract Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis, whose exposure to asbestos fibers is the main etiology. The incidence of MPM is anticipated to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Anticancer Drugs</em>. 2011 Mar;22(3):199-205. [<a href="http://journals.lww.com/anti-cancerdrugs/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2011&amp;issue=03000&amp;article=00001&amp;type=abstract">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Greillier L, Marco S, Barlesi F.</strong></p>
<p>Service  d&#8217;Oncologie Multidisciplinaire et Innovations Thérapeutiques,  Université de la Méditerranée-Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille,  Marseille, France.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p>Malignant  pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis,  whose exposure to asbestos fibers is the main etiology. The incidence of  MPM is anticipated to increase worldwide during the first half of this  century. MPM is notoriously refractory to most treatments, and the only  standard of care is cisplatin and antifolate first-line chemotherapy.  The urgent need for additional therapeutic agents, in parallel with  advances in the knowledge of the molecular events of oncogenesis, has  resulted in the development of the so-called &#8216;targeted agents&#8217; that  specifically inhibit critical pathways in malignant cells and in their  microenvironment. We carried out a comprehensive review of the  literature from January 2000 to May 2010 on studies that assessed  targeted agents for the systemic treatment of MPM. Although tyrosine  kinase inhibitors directed against the epidermal growth factor and the  platelet-derived growth factor receptors did not show significant  clinical activity in phase II studies, some other targeted therapies  seemed promising, notably histone deacetylase inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents. However, none of these has yet reached daily  practice. That is the reason why efforts must continue in the area of  clinical and translational research for MPM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/26/targeted-therapies-in-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-a-review-of-clinical-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thymidylate synthase and excision repair cross-complementing group-1 as predictors of responsiveness in mesothelioma patients treated with pemetrexed/carboplatin</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/25/thymidylate-synthase-and-excision-repair-cross-complementing-group-1-as-predictors-of-responsiveness-in-mesothelioma-patients-treated-with-pemetrexedcarboplatin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/25/thymidylate-synthase-and-excision-repair-cross-complementing-group-1-as-predictors-of-responsiveness-in-mesothelioma-patients-treated-with-pemetrexedcarboplatin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carboplatin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pemetrexed (Alimta)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinical Cancer Research. 2011 Apr 15;17(8):2581-90. Epub 2011 Jan 24. [Link] Zucali PA, Giovannetti E, Destro A, Mencoboni M, Ceresoli GL, Gianoncelli L, Lorenzi E, De Vincenzo F, Simonelli M, Perrino M, Bruzzone A, Thunnissen E, Tunesi G, Giordano L, Roncalli M, Peters GJ, Santoro A. Department of Oncology, Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Clinical Cancer Research</em>. 2011 Apr 15;17(8):2581-90. Epub  2011 Jan 24. [<a href="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/17/8/2581.abstract">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Zucali PA, Giovannetti E, Destro A, Mencoboni M, Ceresoli GL, Gianoncelli L, Lorenzi E, De Vincenzo F, Simonelli M, Perrino M, Bruzzone A, Thunnissen E, Tunesi G, Giordano L, Roncalli M, Peters GJ, Santoro A.</strong><strong></strong></p>
<p>Department of Oncology, Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. paolo.zucali@humanitas.it</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The  pemetrexed/platinum agent combination represents the standard of care  in first-line treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).  However, there are no established indicators of responsiveness that can  be used to optimize the treatment. This retrospective study aimed to  assess the role of excision repair cross-complementing group-1 (ERCC1)  and thymidylate synthase (TS) in tumors, and correlate expression levels  and polymorphisms of these key determinants of drug activity with the  outcome of MPM patients treated with carboplatin/pemetrexed in  first-line setting. Experimental design: Analysis of TS and ERCC1  polymorphisms, mRNA and protein expression was done by PCR and  immunohistochemistry [with the H-score (histologic score)] in tumor  specimens from 126 MPM patients, including 99  carboplatin-/pemetrexed-treated patients.</p>
<p><strong>Results: </strong> A  significant correlation between low TS protein expression and disease  control (DC) to carboplatin/pemetrexed therapy (P = 0.027), longer  progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.017), and longer overall survival  (OS; P = 0.022) was found when patients were categorized according to  median H-score. However, patients with the higher tertile of TS mRNA  expression correlated with higher risk of developing progressive disease  (P = 0.022), shorter PFS (P &lt; 0.001), and shorter OS (P &lt; 0.001).  At multivariate analysis, the higher tertile of TS mRNA level and TS  H-score confirmed their independent prognostic role for DC, PFS, and OS.  No significant associations were found among ERCC1 protein expression,  TS and ERCC1 polymorphisms, and clinical outcome.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> In  our series of carboplatin-/pemetrexed-treated MPM patients, low TS  protein and mRNA levels were significantly associated to DC, improved  PFS, and OS. Prospective trials for the validation of the  prognostic/predictive role of TS in MPM patients treated with  pemetrexed-based regimens are warranted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/25/thymidylate-synthase-and-excision-repair-cross-complementing-group-1-as-predictors-of-responsiveness-in-mesothelioma-patients-treated-with-pemetrexedcarboplatin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biological Materials for Diaphragmatic Repair: Initial Experiences with the PeriGuard Repair Patch&#174;</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/19/biological-materials-for-diaphragmatic-repair-initial-experiences-with-the-periguard-repair-patch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/19/biological-materials-for-diaphragmatic-repair-initial-experiences-with-the-periguard-repair-patch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extrapleural Pneumonectomy (EPP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. 2011 Feb;59(1):40-4. Epub 2011 Jan 17. [Link] Zardo P, Zhang R, Wiegmann B, Haverich A, Fischer S. Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Assist, Klinikum Ibbenbüren, Ibbenbüren, Germany. Abstract Background: We sought to analyze the efficacy of a bovine pericardial patch (PeriGuard®) for diaphragmatic repair. Methods: Seven consecutive patients (6 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon</em>. 2011 Feb;59(1):40-4. Epub 2011 Jan 17. [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21243571">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Zardo P, Zhang R, Wiegmann B, Haverich A, Fischer S.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Assist, Klinikum Ibbenbüren, Ibbenbüren, Germany.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Background</strong>: We sought to analyze the efficacy of a bovine pericardial patch (PeriGuard®) for diaphragmatic repair.</p>
<p><strong>Methods</strong>: Seven consecutive patients (6 males, median age 56 years) scheduled for diaphragmatic resection and/or repair were enrolled in this study. In all cases diaphragmatic repair was performed with a PeriGuard Repair Patch® (Synovis, St. Paul, MN, USA). At follow-up (median: 12 months; range: 6-18 months), quality of life, signs of reherniation and incorporation of mesh were assessed through clinical examination, blood samples and CT or MRT scan.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: Diagnosis on admission included sarcoma (n = 2), mesothelioma (n = 1), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1), parachordoma (n = 1) and large congenital or posttraumatic herniation (n = 2). At follow-up successful diaphragmatic repair with no signs of reherniation, graft dehiscence or seroma formation was confirmed for all patients. Recorded inflammatory markers [C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC) and procalcitonin (PCT)] reached their peak values between postoperative day (POD) 4 and POD 7. Values ranged from 122-282 mg/L for CRP, 0.4-4.6 µg/L for PCT and 6.2-15.6 Tsd/µL for WBC. Overall oncological results were good and 5 out of 6 survivors reported a fully reestablished quality of life.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: We consider the PeriGuard Repair Patch&reg; a viable alternative to synthetic materials for diaphragm replacement. Moreover, we advise carrying out cautious follow-up in patients undergoing extensive oncological resection to learn more about the biological behavior of the bovine PeriGuard Repair Patch® after diaphragmatic repair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/19/biological-materials-for-diaphragmatic-repair-initial-experiences-with-the-periguard-repair-patch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dasatinib: An Anti-Tumour Agent via Src Inhibition</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/14/dasatinib-an-anti-tumour-agent-via-src-inhibition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/14/dasatinib-an-anti-tumour-agent-via-src-inhibition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinase Inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Current Drug Targets. 2011 Jan 11. [Epub ahead of print] [Link] Gnoni A, Marech I, Silvestris N, Vacca A, Lorusso V. Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Vito Fazzi &#8211; Lecce, Italy. vitolorusso@inwind.it. Abstract Dasatinib (BMS-354825, Sprycel®) is an oral, multitargeted inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including BCR-ABL fusion protein, stem cell factor receptor (c-KIT), platelet-derived [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Current Drug Targets</em>. 2011 Jan 11. [Epub ahead of print] [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21226671">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Gnoni A, Marech I, Silvestris N, Vacca A, Lorusso V.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Vito Fazzi &#8211; Lecce, Italy. vitolorusso@inwind.it.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p>Dasatinib (BMS-354825, Sprycel®) is an oral, multitargeted inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including BCR-ABL fusion protein, stem cell factor receptor (c-KIT), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and Src family kinases (SFKs). Several early- and late-phase clinical trials for chronic myelogeneous leukaemia (CML) have demonstrated the direct inhibition of BCR-ABL fusion protein and SFKs, which led to dasatinib approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Union for the treatment of imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Phase III dose-optimization study was performed to compare different regimens, stating that dasatinib 100 mg once daily is now the recommended schedule for patients with chronic CML, and 140 mg once daily for patients with accelerated phase or myeloid or lymphoid blast phase CML, and for patients with Ph+ ALL until progression. Because of the myriad of critical roles of SFKs in biological processes, SFKs inhibition could induce numerous biological responses. Ongoing clinical trials evaluate dasatinib in the treatment of several solid tumours, including gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), prostate cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, sarcomas, NSCLC, colorectal cancer, glioblastoma and other haematologic malignances as multiple myeloma. Ongoing pre-clinical studies assess the therapeutic potential of dasatinib in other solid tumours, including melanoma, head and neck cancer, breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Dasatinib is generally well tolerated. Myelosuppression is the common adverse event which is, however, reversible by dose reduction, discontinuation, or interruption. Thrombocytopenia is more significant than neutropenia and associated to gastrointestinal bleeding and CNS haemorrhage. The most common non-haematologic adverse events include gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and anorexia), headache, peripheral edema, and pleural effusion. In respect of these encouraging studies investigating dasatinib in the treatment of patients with GIST, prostate cancer, multiple myeloma and sarcomas, ongoing phase III clinical trials warrant the drug evaluation as recommended agent for the treatment of these diseases, also in association with chemoterapy or other targeted therapies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/14/dasatinib-an-anti-tumour-agent-via-src-inhibition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indication of Peritonectomy for Peritoneal Dissemination</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/13/indication-of-peritonectomy-for-peritoneal-dissemination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/13/indication-of-peritonectomy-for-peritoneal-dissemination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritonectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2010 Nov;37(12):2306-2311. [Link] Yonemura Y, Tsukiyama G, Miyata R, Sako S, Endou Y, Hirano M, Mizumoto A, Matsuda T, Takao N, Ichinose M, Miura M, Hagiwara A, Li Y. NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment. Abstract A total of 521 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) were treated by peritonectomy and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Gan To Kagaku Ryoho</em>. 2010 Nov;37(12):2306-2311. [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21224556">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Yonemura Y, Tsukiyama G, Miyata R, Sako S, Endou Y, Hirano M, Mizumoto A, Matsuda T, Takao N, Ichinose M, Miura M, Hagiwara A, Li Y.</strong></p>
<p>NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p>A total of 521 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) were treated  by peritonectomy and perioperative chemotherapy. Each of the 95, 58,  316, 31, 10 and 11 patients were from gastric, colorectal, appendiceal,  ovarian, small bowel cancer and mesothelioma, respectively. The  distribution and volume of PC are recorded by the Sugarbaker peritoneal  carcinomatosis index( PCI). Peritonectomy was performed with a radical  resection of the primary tumor and all gross PC with involved organs,  peritoneum, or tissue that was deemed technically feasible and safe for  the patient. The postoperative major complication of grade 3 was found  in 14%, and total 30 &#8211; day mortality was 2.7%. The survival of gastric  cancer patients with a PCI score &le; 6 was significantly better than those  with a PCI score &ge; 7. In appendiceal neoplasm, patients with PCI score  less than 28 showed significantly better survival than those with PCI  score greater than 29. The survival of colorectal cancer patients with a  PCI score &ge; 11 was significantly poorer than those with a PCI score &le;  10. Among the various prognostic factors in appendiceal neoplasm and  gastric cancer patients, CC &#8211; 0 complete cytoreduction was the most  important independent prognostic factor. Peritonectomy is done to remove  macroscopic disease and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy to  eradicate microscopic residual disease aiming to remove disease  completely with a single procedure. Peritonectomy combined with  perioperative chemotherapy may achieve long &#8211; term survival in a  selected group of patients with PC. The higher mortality rate underlines  this necessarily strict selection that should be reserved to  experienced institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/13/indication-of-peritonectomy-for-peritoneal-dissemination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phase I Studies of CBP501,a G2 Checkpoint Abrogator, as Monotherapy and in Combination with Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/12/phase-i-studies-of-cbp501a-g2-checkpoint-abrogator-as-monotherapy-and-in-combination-with-cisplatin-in-patients-with-advanced-solid-tumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/12/phase-i-studies-of-cbp501a-g2-checkpoint-abrogator-as-monotherapy-and-in-combination-with-cisplatin-in-patients-with-advanced-solid-tumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisplatin (Platinol ®)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinase Inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinical Cancer Research. 2011 Jan 10. [Epub ahead of print] [Link] Shapiro GI, Tibes R, Gordon MS, Wong BY, Eder JP, Borad MJ, Mendelson DS, Vogelzang NJ, Bastos BR, Weiss GJ, Fernandez C, Sutherland W, Sato H, Pierceall WE, Weaver D, Slough S, Wasserman E, Kufe DW, Von Hoff DD, Kawabe T, Sharma S. Department [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Clinical Cancer Research</em>. 2011 Jan 10. [Epub ahead of print] [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21220472">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Shapiro GI, Tibes R, Gordon MS, Wong BY, Eder JP, Borad MJ, Mendelson DS, Vogelzang NJ, Bastos BR, Weiss GJ, Fernandez C, Sutherland W, Sato H, Pierceall WE, Weaver D, Slough S, Wasserman E, Kufe DW, Von Hoff DD, Kawabe T, Sharma S.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Purpose</strong>: Two  phase I dose-escalation studies were conducted to determine the maximum  tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of the G2 checkpoint abrogator  CBP501, as a single agent and in combination with cisplatin.</p>
<p><strong>Experimental Design</strong>: Patients  with advanced solid tumors were treated with CBP501 alone (D1/D8/D15,  q4w, from 0.9 mg/m&amp;sup2;), or with cisplatin (both on D1, q3w, from  3.6 mg/m&amp;sup2; CBP501, 50 mg/m&amp;sup2; cisplatin). Dose escalation  proceeded if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in &le;1 of 3-6  patients; CBP501 dose increments were implemented according to the  incidence of toxicity. MTD was determined from DLTs occurring during the  first two cycles.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: In  the combination study, the DLT was a histamine-release syndrome (HRS)  occurring 10-60 minutes after initiating infusion that was attenuated by  prophylaxis comprising dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, ranitidine and  loratadine. The MTD was 25 mg/m&amp;sup2; CBP501 and 75 mg/m&amp;sup2;  cisplatin, with 2 patients at the highest dose (36.4 mg/m&amp;sup2;  CBP501, 75 mg/m&amp;sup2; cisplatin) experiencing grade 3 HRS. The only  DLT with monotherapy was transient G3 rise of troponin in one patient.  Grade 3-4 treatment-related events were rare. Promising activity was  observed with CBP501/cisplatin, mainly in ovarian and mesothelioma  patients who had previously progressed on platinum-containing regimens.  Among ovarian cancer patients, low expression of DNA repair proteins was  associated with partial response or stable disease.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: CBP501  is well tolerated in patients as monotherapy and with cisplatin. At the  recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) the combination is feasible and HRS  manageable with prophylaxis. Evidence of anti-tumor activity was  observed in platinum-resistant patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/12/phase-i-studies-of-cbp501a-g2-checkpoint-abrogator-as-monotherapy-and-in-combination-with-cisplatin-in-patients-with-advanced-solid-tumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pemetrexed plus Cisplatin in Chemonaive Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma or Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2009/01/02/phase-i-and-pharmacokinetic-study-of-pemetrexed-plus-cisplatin-in-chemonaive-patients-with-locally-advanced-or-metastatic-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-or-non%e2%80%93small-cell-lung-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2009/01/02/phase-i-and-pharmacokinetic-study-of-pemetrexed-plus-cisplatin-in-chemonaive-patients-with-locally-advanced-or-metastatic-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-or-non%e2%80%93small-cell-lung-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisplatin (Platinol ®)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pemetrexed (Alimta)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinical Cancer Research. 2009 Jan 1;15(1):382-9. [Link] Dickgreber NJ, Fink TH, Latz JE, Hossain AM, Musib LC, Thomas M. Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. nicolas.dickgreber@gmx.de Abstract Purpose: Pemetrexed is approved as monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin. The established combination dose was identified before the addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 to the treatment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Clinical Cancer Research</em>. 2009 Jan 1;15(1):382-9. [<a href="http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/15/1/382.long">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Dickgreber NJ, Fink TH, Latz JE, Hossain AM, Musib LC, Thomas M.</strong></p>
<p>Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. nicolas.dickgreber@gmx.de</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> Pemetrexed is approved as monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin. The established combination dose was identified before the addition of folic acid and vitamin B<sub>12</sub> to the treatment regimen. We evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of higher pemetrexed doses with cisplatin and vitamin supplementation.</p>
<p><strong>Experimental Design:</strong> Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or non–small cell lung cancer received pemetrexed doses from 500 to 900 mg/m<sup>2</sup> + 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin once every 21 days. Folic acid and vitamin B<sub>12</sub> were administered per label recommendations.</p>
<p><strong>Results:</strong> Twenty-one patients received a combined total of 84 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was 900 mg/m<sup>2</sup> pemetrexed + 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin. Dose-limiting toxicities at this dose included grade 3 anemia, bronchopneumonia, and neutropenia, and 1 death from sepsis secondary to grade 4 febrile neutropenia, considered possibly related to study drugs. The recommended dose was 800 mg/m<sup>2</sup> pemetrexed + 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin. Pemetrexed PK were consistent across doses; pemetrexed did not seem to affect total or free platinum PK.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Pemetrexed with vitamin supplementation was safe and well tolerated at higher doses than the currently established 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> + 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin. Based on this study, the recommended dose would be 800 mg/m<sup>2</sup> pemetrexed + 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin. However, recent studies showed a lack of improved efficacy for 900 or 1,000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> single-agent pemetrexed versus 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and a lack of PK/pharmacodynamic exposure-response relationship for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination across pemetrexed exposures corresponding to this dose range. Based on currently available evidence, we recommend retaining the established dose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2009/01/02/phase-i-and-pharmacokinetic-study-of-pemetrexed-plus-cisplatin-in-chemonaive-patients-with-locally-advanced-or-metastatic-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-or-non%e2%80%93small-cell-lung-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peritoneal mesothelioma: treatment with cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/25/peritoneal-mesothelioma-treatment-with-cytoreductive-surgery-combined-with-hyperthermic-intraperitoneal-chemotherapy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/25/peritoneal-mesothelioma-treatment-with-cytoreductive-surgery-combined-with-hyperthermic-intraperitoneal-chemotherapy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 15:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor Debulking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale. 2008 Sep-Oct;145(5):447-53.[Article in French] [Link] Passot G, Cotte E, Brigand C, Beaujard AC, Isaac S, Gilly FN, Glehen O. Service de chirurgie générale digestive et endocrinienne, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud (CHLS) &#8211; Lyon. Abstract Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare and lethal disease. Locoregional treatments combining cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale</em>. 2008 Sep-Oct;145(5):447-53.[Article in French] [<a href="http://www.em-consulte.com/article/194833">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Passot G, Cotte E, Brigand C, Beaujard AC, Isaac S, Gilly FN, Glehen O.</strong></p>
<p>Service de chirurgie générale digestive et endocrinienne, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud (CHLS) &#8211; Lyon.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p>Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare and lethal disease. Locoregional treatments combining cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) seem to improve prognosis.</p>
<p><strong>Methods</strong>: Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC was performed in 22 patients at the Centre Hospitalier-Lyon Sud between 1989 and 2006. A retrospective analysis of survival was carried out to assess clinical and histological prognostic factors.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: Nineteen patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma were included (16 epithelial, 3 biphasic and 3 multicystic forms). Sixteen patients presented stage 3 or 4 peritoneal carcinomatosis according to the Gilly classification. Optimal cytoreductive surgery was performed for 11 patients (complete macroscopic resection or residual tumor nodules less than 2.5mm). No post-operative deaths occurred but 9 patients (47%) presented grade III or IV post-operative complications. The overall median survival was 36.9 months; completeness of cytoreduction was the only significant prognostic factor.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC may improve the length of survival for patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma; such patients should be treated in specialized centers.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Peritoneal Mesothelioma , Treatment , Cytoreductive surgery , Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/25/peritoneal-mesothelioma-treatment-with-cytoreductive-surgery-combined-with-hyperthermic-intraperitoneal-chemotherapy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: an observational study</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/19/gemcitabine-combined-with-oxaliplatin-in-pretreated-patients-with-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-an-observational-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/19/gemcitabine-combined-with-oxaliplatin-in-pretreated-patients-with-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-an-observational-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemcitabine (Gemzar)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pemetrexed (Alimta)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2008 Dec 18;3:34. [Link] Xanthopoulos A, Bauer TT, Blum TG, Kollmeier J, Schönfeld N, Serke M. Respiratory Diseases Clinic Heckeshorn, Department of Pneumology, HELIOS Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany. torsten.bauer@helios-kliniken.de. Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin +/- gemcitabine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology</em>. 2008 Dec 18;3:34. [<a href="http://www.occup-med.com/content/3/1/34">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Xanthopoulos A, Bauer TT, Blum TG, Kollmeier J, Schönfeld N, Serke M.</strong></p>
<p>Respiratory Diseases Clinic Heckeshorn, Department of Pneumology, HELIOS Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany. torsten.bauer@helios-kliniken.de.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Background</strong>: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin +/- gemcitabine in patients with diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) pretreated with pemetrexed.</p>
<p><strong>Methods</strong>: The study enrolled consecutive patients with relapsed MPM, all of them pretreated with a platin-pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 was administered as monotherapy or in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 given on day 1 and 8. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. The primary endpoints were response rate and disease control rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to tumour progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and toxicity.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: Between February 2005 and September 2007 29 patients (median age: 65.0 years, World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status: 0-3) were enrolled. The follow-up period encompassed 5.4 to 97.4 weeks (median: 24.3 weeks). Out of these 29 patients, 15 were treated in second, 10 in third, 3 in fourth and 1 in fifth line, respectively. The majority of the patients received the combination oxaliplatin and gemcitabine (n = 25 vs. 4; 86.2 vs. 13.8%).The median overall survival (OS) was 71.7 weeks (30.6-243.3 weeks), whereas survival from the start of oxaliplatin/gemcitabine-treatment was 24.3 weeks (5.4-97.3 weeks). Median time to tumour progression (TTP) was 9.3 weeks (3.0-67.6 weeks).Partial response (PR) was observed in 2 patients (6.9%), stable disease (SD) for at least three courses of treatment in 11 patients (37.9%). Thus, disease control rate was 44.8%, whereas 16 of 29 patients exhibited progressive disease (55.2%).The toxicity profile was favourable, with no WHO grade 4-toxicities, only few dose-reductions were performed due to non-symptomatic haematotoxicities (neutropenia, thrombopenia). Mild WHO grade 2 neurotoxicity was seen in 6 patients.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Pemetrexed-pretreated patients with progressive MPM may benefit from a consecutive chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and gemcitabine without significant toxicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/19/gemcitabine-combined-with-oxaliplatin-in-pretreated-patients-with-malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-an-observational-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: an analysis of 27 cases</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/18/medical-thoracoscopic-talc-pleurodesis-for-malignant-pleural-effusion-an-analysis-of-27-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/18/medical-thoracoscopic-talc-pleurodesis-for-malignant-pleural-effusion-an-analysis-of-27-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Determining Efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural Effusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleurodesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symptoms & Symptom Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008 Dec 18;40(6):600-2. [Article in Chinese] [Link] Zhang W, Wang GF, Zhang H, Mu XD, Jin Z. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China. Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of talc poudrage pleurodesis via semi-rigid medical thoracoscopy in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao</em>. 2008 Dec 18;40(6):600-2. [Article in Chinese] [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19088831?dopt=AbstractPlus">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Zhang W, Wang GF, Zhang H, Mu XD, Jin Z.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p><strong>Objective</strong>: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of talc poudrage pleurodesis via semi-rigid medical thoracoscopy in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions, as well as the factors that may influence the outcomes.</p>
<p><strong>Methods</strong>: A series of 27 patients with malignant pleural effusion underwent medical thoracoscopic talc poudrage pleurodesis between July 2005 and September 2007 in Peking University First Hospital.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: There were 16 male and 11 female patients in the series, the average age being 65.2 years. All the patients had documented malignant pleural effusions, including 16 cases of adenocarcinoma, 6 of malignant mesothelioma, 2 of squamous cell carcinoma, 1 of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma, 1 of small cell carcinoma and 1 of undifferentiated lung cancer. Thirty days after the procedures, complete successful pleurodesis was achieved in 22 cases, and partial successful in 4 cases. Pleurodesis was not successful in one case. Overall successful rate was 96.3% (26/27). The average duration of thoracic tubing was 6.85 days. Chest pain, fever and an increase in peripheral WBC after the procedure occurred in 19(70.4%, 19/27), 21(77.8%, 21/27), and 12(44.4%, 12/27) cases respectively. No respiratory failure occurred.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Medical thoracoscopic talc poudrage pleurodesis is a safe and effective method for the treatment of malignant pleural effusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/18/medical-thoracoscopic-talc-pleurodesis-for-malignant-pleural-effusion-an-analysis-of-27-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

