<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mesothelioma Journal Articles &#187; Benign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/category/benign-mesothelioma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles</link>
	<description>Journal Articles on Mesothelioma: Cancer Information for Patients and Families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mesothelial cell inclusions mimicking adenocarcinoma in cervical lymph nodes in association with chylous effusion</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/07/mesothelial-cell-inclusions-mimicking-adenocarcinoma-in-cervical-lymph-nodes-in-association-with-chylous-effusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/07/mesothelial-cell-inclusions-mimicking-adenocarcinoma-in-cervical-lymph-nodes-in-association-with-chylous-effusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immunohistochemistry or IHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural Effusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symptoms & Symptom Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. 2010 Apr;31(2):62-4. [Link] Goyal M, Kodandapani S, Sharanabasappa SN, Palanki SD. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Indo-American Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Hyderabad, India. Abstract Mesothelial cell inclusions in lymph nodes are of rare occurrence and can be mistaken as metastatic adenocarcinomas, mesothelioma or sinus histiocytosis. These are usually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology</em>. 2010 Apr;31(2):62-4. [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2970937/?tool=pubmed">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Goyal M, Kodandapani S, Sharanabasappa SN, Palanki SD.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Laboratory Medicine, Indo-American Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Hyderabad, India.</p>
<h3> Abstract </h3>
<p>Mesothelial cell  inclusions in lymph nodes are of rare occurrence and can be mistaken as  metastatic adenocarcinomas, mesothelioma or sinus histiocytosis. These  are usually found in mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes and are  associated with effusions. We report a case of benign mesothelial cell  inclusions in cervical lymph nodes, which was associated with chylous  effusion, and immunohistochemistry revealed unusual weak cytoplasmic  epithelial membrane antigen positivity in the cells.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Adenocarcinoma, chylous effusion, epithelial membrane antigen, mesothelial cell inclusions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2011/01/07/mesothelial-cell-inclusions-mimicking-adenocarcinoma-in-cervical-lymph-nodes-in-association-with-chylous-effusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cystic peritoneal mesothelioma: report of a case</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2010/12/31/cystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-report-of-a-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2010/12/31/cystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-report-of-a-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surgery Today. 2011 Jan;41(1):141-6. Epub 2010 Dec 30. [Link] Cavallaro A, Berretta M, Lo Menzo E, Cavallaro V, Zanghì A, Di Vita M, Cappellani A. Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. Abstract Benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (BMPM) is a rare disease with good short-term prognosis and rare malignant transformation. However, its biological significance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Surgery Today.</em> 2011 Jan;41(1):141-6. Epub  2010 Dec 30. [<a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/g112630161x30656/">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Cavallaro A, Berretta M, Lo Menzo E, Cavallaro V, Zanghì A, Di Vita M, Cappellani A.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p>Benign  multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (BMPM) is a rare disease with good  short-term prognosis and rare malignant transformation. However, its  biological significance remains unexplained. A neoplastic origin is  considered by many authors to require a surgical excision, based on the  high recurrence and progressive growth rate of the tumors. However,  alternative or integrative treatment options have also been proposed. A  45-year-old woman presented to our unit with a history of occasional  discomfort and pain in the left hip. On physical examination, we noticed  a tough-elastic, fixed mass located in the iliac fossa. Computed  tomography scan detected a mass with multiseptated cystic-like areas.  Due to the similarity of these findings to a primitive sarcomatous tumor  of the retroperitoneum, an arteriographic study was also performed. The  patient underwent en bloc resection of the mass, including a segment of  the sigmoid colon. The final pathologic diagnosis was cystic  mesothelioma. Further studies are needed to better understand the  etiology and pathogenesis of this rare disease, and to define a more  tailored treatment plan.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma – Calretinin – Cytokeratin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2010/12/31/cystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-report-of-a-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malignant mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/23/malignant-mesothelioma-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/23/malignant-mesothelioma-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Causation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CT or CAT scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Asbestos Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupational Asbestos Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pericardial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symptoms & Symptom Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trimodality Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunica Vaginalis Testis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2008 Dec 19;3:34. [Link] Moore AJ, Parker RJ, Wiggins J. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wexham Park Hospital, Wexham, Slough, Berkshire, UK. a.moore@ic.ac.uk Abstract Malignant mesothelioma is a fatal asbestos-associated malignancy originating from the lining cells (mesothelium) of the pleural and peritoneal cavities, as well as the pericardium and the tunica [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases</em>. 2008 Dec 19;3:34. [<a href="http://www.ojrd.com/content/3/1/34">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Moore AJ, Parker RJ, Wiggins J.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wexham Park Hospital, Wexham, Slough, Berkshire, UK. a.moore@ic.ac.uk</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p>Malignant mesothelioma is a fatal asbestos-associated malignancy originating from the lining cells (mesothelium) of the pleural and peritoneal cavities, as well as the pericardium and the tunica vaginalis. The exact prevalence is unknown but it is estimated that mesotheliomas represent less than 1% of all cancers. Its incidence is increasing, with an expected peak in the next 10-20 years. Pleural malignant mesothelioma is the most common form of mesothelioma. Typical presenting features are those of chest pain and dyspnoea. Breathlessness due to a pleural effusion without chest pain is reported in about 30% of patients. A chest wall mass, weight loss, sweating, abdominal pain and ascites (due to peritoneal involvement) are less common presentations. Mesothelioma is directly attributable to occupational asbestos exposure with a history of exposure in over 90% of cases. There is also evidence that mesothelioma may result from both para-occupational exposure and non-occupational &#8220;environmental&#8221; exposure. Idiopathic or spontaneous mesothelioma can also occur in the absence of any exposure to asbestos, with a spontaneous rate in humans of around one per million. A combination of accurate exposure history, along with examination radiology and pathology are essential to make the diagnosis. Distinguishing malignant from benign pleural disease can be challenging. The most helpful CT findings suggesting malignant pleural disease are 1) a circumferential pleural rind, 2) nodular pleural thickening, 3) pleural thickening of &gt; 1 cm and 4) mediastinal pleural involvement. Involvement of a multidisciplinary team is recommended to ensure prompt and appropriate management, using a framework of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery and symptom palliation with end of life care. Compensation issues must also be considered. Life expectancy in malignant mesothelioma is poor, with a median survival of about one year following diagnosis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/12/23/malignant-mesothelioma-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benign mesothelioma of peritoneum presenting as a pelvic mass</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/06/benign-mesothelioma-of-peritoneum-presenting-as-a-pelvic-mass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/06/benign-mesothelioma-of-peritoneum-presenting-as-a-pelvic-mass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons&#8212;Pakistan. 2008 Nov;18(11):723-5. [Link] Asghar S, Qureshi N, Awan A. Department of Gyneacology, Unit-1, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore. samina_asghar62@yahoo.com Abstract A large solitary multiloculated pelvic cyst in a 40-year-old woman with chronic pelvic pain was diagnosed to be a Multicystic Benign Mesothelioma (MBM) of peritoneum at laparotomy. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons&#8212;Pakistan</em>. 2008 Nov;18(11):723-5. [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18983801?dopt=AbstractPlus" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>    Asghar S, Qureshi N, Awan A.</strong></p>
<p> Department of Gyneacology, Unit-1, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore. samina_asghar62@yahoo.com</p>
<h3>Abstract</h3>
<p> A large solitary multiloculated pelvic cyst in a 40-year-old woman with chronic pelvic pain was diagnosed to be a Multicystic Benign Mesothelioma (MBM) of peritoneum at laparotomy. Operative findings showed dense adhesions between uterus and bladder anteriorly, small intestines and pouch of Douglas posteriorly, a right ovarian cyst cm containing clear serous fluid and two nodular deposits were seen in the pouch of Douglas, small multiple deposits was found over the mesentery of small intestine and parietal peritoneum. Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy and infracolic omentectomy was done. During surgery, there was injury to the small intestine hence, resection of 10 inches of small intestine with re-anastomosis was carried out. Postoperative recovery was satisfactory. At 3 years follow-up, patient is symptom-free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/06/benign-mesothelioma-of-peritoneum-presenting-as-a-pelvic-mass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cytopathologic differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells: A logistic regression analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/01/cytopathologic-differential-diagnosis-of-malignant-mesothelioma-adenocarcinoma-and-reactive-mesothelial-cells-a-logistic-regression-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/01/cytopathologic-differential-diagnosis-of-malignant-mesothelioma-adenocarcinoma-and-reactive-mesothelial-cells-a-logistic-regression-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2009 Jan;37(1):4-10. [Link] Cakir E, Demirag F, Aydin M, Unsal E. Department of Pathology, Ankara Ataturk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. arabaci.ebru@gmail.com Abstract Distinguishing malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial proliferation in both cytologic and surgical pathologic specimens is often a diagnostic challenge. Conventional cytomorphologic assessment is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Diagnostic Cytopathology</em>. 2009 Jan;37(1):4-10. [<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18973227?dopt=AbstractPlus" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Cakir E, Demirag F, Aydin M, Unsal E.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Pathology, Ankara Ataturk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. arabaci.ebru@gmail.com</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p>Distinguishing malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial proliferation in both cytologic and surgical pathologic specimens is often a diagnostic challenge. Conventional cytomorphologic assessment is an important step in the differential diagnosis of these entities.<br />
  The pleural effusion cytologies from 40 cases of malignant mesothelioma, 40 cases of adenocarcinoma and 30 cases of reactive mesothelial proliferation diagnosed between 1997 and 2007 were reviewed. Twenty-seven cytologic features which are regarded as useful in the differential diagnosis of mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and benign mesothelial proliferation were assessed. These cytologic features were subjected to a stepwise logistic regression analysis. Three features were selected to distinguish malignant mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma: giant atypical mesothelial cell (P = 0.0001), nuclear pleomorphism (P = 0.0001) and acinar structures (P = 0.0001), the latter two being characteristics of adenocarcinoma. The variables selected to differentiate malignant mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial cells were: cell ball formation (P = 0.0001), cell in cell engulfment (P = 0.0001) and monolayer cell groups (P = 0.0001), the latter being a feature of benign mesothelial proliferation. When these selected variables were subjected to a stepwise logistic regression analysis, the logistic model correctly predicted 90% of cases of benign mesothelial proliferation versus 97.5% of malignant mesothelioma and 92.5% of malignant mesothelioma versus 92.5% of adenocarcinoma.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma, mesothelial proliferation, cytodiagnosis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/11/01/cytopathologic-differential-diagnosis-of-malignant-mesothelioma-adenocarcinoma-and-reactive-mesothelial-cells-a-logistic-regression-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mesothelial reaction in longstanding Crohn&#8217;s ileitis simulating papillary mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/09/30/mesothelial-reaction-in-longstanding-crohns-ileitis-simulating-papillary-mesothelioma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/09/30/mesothelial-reaction-in-longstanding-crohns-ileitis-simulating-papillary-mesothelioma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2008;61:1119-1121. [Link] Wilkinson L, De P, Bloxham C. University Hospital of North Durham, North Road, Durham, UK. lsarkar@talk21.com Abstract Intestinal and extraintestinal complications of Crohn’s disease are well documented. Changes in the connective tissue within the intestinal wall and surrounding tissue including mesenteric fat are characteristically seen in resected and autopsy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> Journal of Clinical Pathology</em>. 2008;61:1119-1121. [<a href="http://jcp.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/61/10/1119" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Wilkinson L, De P, Bloxham C.</strong></p>
<p>University Hospital of North Durham, North Road, Durham, UK. lsarkar@talk21.com</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p>Intestinal and extraintestinal complications of Crohn’s disease are well documented. Changes in the connective tissue within the intestinal wall and surrounding tissue including mesenteric fat are characteristically seen in resected and autopsy specimens. A rare and unusually florid mesothelial reaction in the surrounding small bowel serosa of a patient with a 2-year history of Crohn’s ileitis is described. The peritoneal surface of the ileal resection specimen displayed exuberant tubulo-papillary formations of the mesothelium, with superficial invasion of the underlying stroma. The case demonstrates the well-recognised difficult differential diagnosis between a benign mesothelial proliferation and malignant mesothelioma in a novel clinical setting, and the diversity of the extramural manifestations of Crohn&#8217;s disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/09/30/mesothelial-reaction-in-longstanding-crohns-ileitis-simulating-papillary-mesothelioma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma in a cesarean-section scar presenting as a fungating mass</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/06/17/benign-multicystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-in-a-cesarean-section-scar-presenting-as-a-fungating-mass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/06/17/benign-multicystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-in-a-cesarean-section-scar-presenting-as-a-fungating-mass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immunohistochemistry or IHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2008 Jun;13(3):275-8. Epub 2008 Jun 14. [Link] Cuartas JE, Maheshwari AV, Qadir R, Cooper AJ, Robinson PG, Pitcher JD Jr. Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. Abstract We report a case of a benign multicystic mesothelioma, which presented as a fungating mass [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> International Journal of Clinical Oncology</em>. 2008 Jun;13(3):275-8. Epub 2008 Jun 14. [<a href="http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/200801-063OCv1">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Cuartas JE, Maheshwari AV, Qadir R, Cooper AJ, Robinson PG, Pitcher JD Jr.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract</h3>
<p> We report a case of a benign multicystic mesothelioma, which presented as a fungating mass through the anterior abdominal wall and arose in a cesarean-section scar without direct peritoneal involvement. A wide local excision was done and the diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology and immunohistochemistry. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient is asymptomatic at 3 years’ follow-up. Although a history of previous abdominal surgery has been reported in a patient with benign multicystic mesothelioma, to the best of our knowledge, there is no report of a benign multicystic mesothelioma arising in a cesarean-section scar or presentation as a fungating skin mass. This unusual presentation may point to a traumatic or inflammatory etiology, although seeding of the wound during the previous surgeries is a more likely postulate. A pertinent review of the literature on benign multicystic mesothelioma is also presented.</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Benign multicystic mesothelioma &#8211; Peritoneal cyst &#8211; Peritoneal inclusion cyst &#8211; Peritoneal tumors &#8211; Cesarean-section scar lesions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/06/17/benign-multicystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-in-a-cesarean-section-scar-presenting-as-a-fungating-mass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cytology of benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma in peritoneal washings</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/05/15/cytology-of-benign-multicystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-in-peritoneal-washings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/05/15/cytology-of-benign-multicystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-in-peritoneal-washings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peritoneal (Abdominal Mesothelioma)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/?p=1179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cytopathology. 2008 May 9. [Epub ahead of print] [Link] Assaly M, Bongiovanni M, Kumar N, Egger JF, Pelte MF, Genevay M, Finci V, Tschanz E, Pache JC. Department of Pathology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract Objective: To describe the cytological aspect of peritoneal washings in benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (BMPM). Methods: Three peritoneal washing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Cytopathology</em>. 2008 May 9. [Epub ahead of print] [<a href="http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00489.x" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Assaly M, Bongiovanni M, Kumar N, Egger JF, Pelte MF, Genevay M, Finci V, Tschanz E, Pache JC.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Pathology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract </h3>
<p><strong>Objective</strong>: To describe the cytological aspect of peritoneal washings in benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (BMPM). </p>
<p><strong>Methods</strong>: Three peritoneal washing specimens stained by standard cytological and histological procedures and analysed by light microscopy. </p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: The specimens showed an abundance of monomorphous mesothelial cells devoid of atypia or mitoses. The mesothelial cells were calretinin positive. They also showed numerous squamous metaplastic cells arranged in flat sheets or isolated cells. The background contained some inflammatory cells. </p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: The combination of cytology of the peritoneal washing, histology (cell block and surgical specimen) and clinical history allow differentiation of BMPM from other cystic lesions (cystic lymphangioma and malignant mesothelioma).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/05/15/cytology-of-benign-multicystic-peritoneal-mesothelioma-in-peritoneal-washings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The diagnostic value of Ki-67 and repp86 in distinguishing between benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/04/04/the-diagnostic-value-of-ki-67-and-repp86-in-distinguishing-between-benign-and-malignant-mesothelial-proliferations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/04/04/the-diagnostic-value-of-ki-67-and-repp86-in-distinguishing-between-benign-and-malignant-mesothelial-proliferations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnosis & Differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immunohistochemistry or IHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serum Marker/Blood Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/04/04/the-diagnostic-value-of-ki-67-and-repp86-in-distinguishing-between-benign-and-malignant-mesothelial-proliferations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2008 Apr;132(4):694-7. [Link] Taheri ZM, Mehrafza M, Mohammadi F, Khoddami M, Bahadori M, Masjedi MR. National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Department of Pathology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mtaheri@nritld.ac.ir Abstract Context: The differentiation of benign mesothelial proliferations from malignant mesotheliomas may be difficult, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine</em>. 2008 Apr;132(4):694-7. [<a href="http://arpa.allenpress.com/arpaonline/?request=get-abstract&#038;issn=1543-a2165&#038;volume=132&#038;page=694" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong> Taheri ZM, Mehrafza M, Mohammadi F, Khoddami M, Bahadori M, Masjedi MR.</strong></p>
<p> National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Department of Pathology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mtaheri@nritld.ac.ir</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract </h3>
<p><strong>Context</strong>: The differentiation of benign mesothelial proliferations from malignant mesotheliomas may be difficult, especially when evaluating small specimens from pleural biopsies.</p>
<p><strong>Objective</strong>: To explore the potential value of 2 proliferative cell markers, Ki-67 and restrictedly expressed proliferation–associated protein 86 kDa (repp86), in distinguishing between malignant mesothelioma (MM) and benign reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (MH).</p>
<p><strong>Design</strong>: Thirty-six cases of MM from 26 men and 10 women with a mean age of 62.9 years (range, 36–80 years) and 22 cases of benign reactive MH from 14 male and 8 female patients with a mean age of 51.5 years (range, 15– 88 years) were included in this study. The proliferative status of the lesions was assessed by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies to Ki-S2 (repp86) and Ki-S5 (Ki-67). The labeling indices were quantified.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: The mean labeling indexes for Ki-67 in MM and benign reactive MH were 24.6% (range, 1%–66%) and 6.23% (range, 0%–25%), respectively. The mean labeling indexes for repp86 in MM and benign reactive MH were 26.3% (range, 0%–50%) and 3.26% (range, 0%– 21%), respectively. The average proliferative cell count was significantly higher in MM compared with benign reactive MH (P &lt; .001). Furthermore, both markers showed a significant correlation in their expression in MM and benign reactive MH (r = 77.5, P &lt; .001). Sensitivities of 88% and 92% and specificities of 92% and 94% were obtained at a cutoff point of 9% for Ki-67 and repp86, respectively.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: Used in combination, Ki-67 and repp86 appear to be useful markers in differentiating MM from benign reactive MH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/04/04/the-diagnostic-value-of-ki-67-and-repp86-in-distinguishing-between-benign-and-malignant-mesothelial-proliferations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I-131 accumulation in a benign cystic mesothelioma in a patient with follicular thyroid cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/02/27/i-131-accumulation-in-a-benign-cystic-mesothelioma-in-a-patient-with-follicular-thyroid-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/02/27/i-131-accumulation-in-a-benign-cystic-mesothelioma-in-a-patient-with-follicular-thyroid-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Assessment:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type of Mesothelioma:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/02/27/i-131-accumulation-in-a-benign-cystic-mesothelioma-in-a-patient-with-follicular-thyroid-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thyroid. 2008 Mar;18(3):369-71. [Link] de Keizer B, Arsos G, Smit JW, Lam MG, Rinkes IH, Goldschmeding R, van Isselt JW. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Abstract Focal I-131 accumulation is generally a reliable indicator of functioning normal thyroid tissue or a differentiated thyroid cancer metastasis. However, physiologic accumulation of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Thyroid</em>. 2008 Mar;18(3):369-71. [<a href="http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/thy.2007.0155" target="_blank">Link</a>]</p>
<p><strong>de Keizer B, Arsos G, Smit JW, Lam MG, Rinkes IH, Goldschmeding R, van Isselt JW.</strong></p>
<p>Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.</p>
<h3 class="abstract">Abstract </h3>
<p>Focal I-131 accumulation is generally a reliable indicator of functioning normal thyroid tissue or a differentiated thyroid cancer metastasis. However, physiologic accumulation of activity may also be observed in organs such as the intestinal tract, liver, and salivary glands. Extrathyroidal I-131 accumulation has been reported in various sites, such as ectopic gastric mucosa, gastrointestinal and urinary tract abnormalities, cysts (mammary, liver, kidney, and ovaries), and inflammation and infection foci. We report a case of focal I-131 accumulation in a benign cystic mesothelioma in a patient with follicular thyroid cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mesothelioma-line.com/articles/2008/02/27/i-131-accumulation-in-a-benign-cystic-mesothelioma-in-a-patient-with-follicular-thyroid-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

