Curated Journal Articles on Mesothelioma

Soluble Mesothelin-Related Peptide Level Elevation in Mesothelioma Serum and Pleural Effusions

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery . 2008 Jan;85(1):265-72; discussion 272. [Link]

Pass HI, Wali A, Tang N, Ivanova A, Ivanov S, Harbut M, Carbone M, Allard J.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.


Background: Soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) is a potential marker for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), which may be useful for screening high-risk asbestos-exposed individuals.

Methods: We evaluated SMRP in serum from MPM patients (n = 90), lung cancer patients (n = 170), age and tobacco-matched asbestos-exposed individuals (n = 66), and in MPM pleural effusions (n = 45), benign effusions (n = 30), and non-MPM effusions (n = 20) using the MesoMark enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Fujirebio Diagnostics, Malvern, PA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to define true and false positive rates at various cutoffs.

Results: Mean serum SMRP levels were higher in MPM compared with lung cancer (5.67 ± 0.82 nM [mean ± standard error of the mean vs 1.99 ± 0.43 nM, p < 0.001), and stage I MPM SMRP levels (n = 12; 2.09 ± 0.41 nM) were significantly higher than those in asbestos-exposed individuals (0.99 ± 0.09 nM, p = 0.02, respectively). Stage 2 to 4 SMRP serum levels were significantly higher than those for stage 1 MPM. The area under the ROC curve for serum SMRP was 0.81 for differentiating MPM and asbestos-exposed individuals; cutoff = 1.9 nM (sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 89%). The MPM pleural effusion SMRP was significantly higher than benign or other non-MPM pleural effusions (65.57 ± 11.33 nM vs 27.46 ± 11.25 nM [p = 0.003] and 18.99 ± 7.48 nM [p = 0.044], respectively).

Conclusions: These data support SMRP as a promising marker for MPM in both serum and pleural effusion fluid, and justify prospective screening studies of SMRP in combination with other markers for screening of asbestos-exposed cohorts.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.